High School Students’ Gender Role Perceptions Regarding Various Professions
pp. 6-15 | Article Number: ijpe.2017.023
This survey study aims to determine the gender role perceptions of high school students regarding several professions. 724 female (56.9%) and 548 male (43.1%) formed the sample of a total of 1272 high school students. The “Gender Role Perceptions regarding Various Professions Questionnaire” was used to determine the gender role perceptions of high school students based on various professions. The findings demonstrated that high school students perceived the professions of teacher, doctor, lawyer, psychologist, and dentist suitable for both male and female gender equally (neutral occupations). High school students perceived the professions of district governor (public administration), military officer, policeman, engineer, judge, prosecutor and architect as predominantly male occupations. On the other hand, students perceived the professions of nurse and dietician as mainly female occupations. The study findings demonstrated that high school students classify various professions as strictly male or female professions. These results demonstrated the significance of school psychological counselors who provide counseling services to students during the career selection process to raise awareness of the students by organizing group guidance activities on gender role perceptions and possible outcomes of various professions.
Keywords: gender role perception, professions, choice of profession, high school students
Adya, M., & Kaiser, K. M. (2005). Early determinants of women in the IT workforce: A model of girls’ career choice. Information Technology & People, 18(3), 230-259.
Betz, N. E., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1987). The career psychology of women. Orlando, FL: Academic.
Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1983). The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 23(3), 329-345.
Bogart, K., & Stein, N. (1987). Breaking the silence: Sexual harassment in education. Peabody Journal of Education, 64(4), 146-163.
Boushey, H., & Cherry, R. (2003). The economic boom (1991-1997) and women: Issues of race, education, and regionalism. NWSA Journal, 15(1), 34-53.
Brown, K. G. (1993). The development of student expectations of a career in science, mathematics, or engineering: An analysis of differences by gender and related contextual variables (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Illinois University, Illinois.
Buschor, C. B., Kappler, C., Frei, A. K., & Berweger, S. (2014). I want to be a scientist/a teacher: students' perceptions of career decision-making in gender typed, 26(7), 743-758. DOI: 10.1080/09540253.2014.970615.
Catsambis, S. (1995). Gender, race, ethnicity, and science academic evaluations in education in the middle school grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3) 243-257.
Cejka, M. A., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the gender segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 413–423.
Chusmir, L. H. (1983). Characteristics and predictive dimensions of women who make nontraditional vocational choices. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 62(1), 43-47.
Colman, W. (1990). Recruitment standards and practice in occupational therapy, 1900-1930. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44(8), 742-748.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Fourth Editions). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Day, M. (1997). Women mathematicians: Eight women's experiences. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 3(1&2), 37-51.
Fitzgerald, L. F., & Betz, N. E. (1994). Career development in cultural context: The role of gender, race, class and sexual orientation. In M. Savickas & R. Lent (Eds.), Convergence in career development theories: Implications for science and practice (pp. 103-115). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Fitzgerald, L. F., & Harmon, L. W. (2001). Women’s Career development: A postmodern update. In F.T. Leong & A. Barak (Eds.), Contemporary models in vocational psychology: A volume in honor of Samuel H. Osipow contemporary topics in vocational psychology series (pp.207-230). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fowler, F. J. (2009). Survey research methods (Fourth Editions). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Inc.
Fujitomi, I., & Wong, D. (1973). The new Asian American woman. In S.Sue & N.N. Wagner (Eds.), Asian Americans: Psychological perspectives (pp. 252-262). Palo Alto: CA: Science & Behaviour Books.
Gottfredson, L.S. (2005). Applying Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription and compromise in career guidance and counseling. In S.D.Brown, & R.W.Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling (pp.71-100). USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Hackett, G., Betz, N. E., Casas, J. M., & Rocha-Singh, I. (1992). Gender, ethnicity, and social cognitive factors predicting the academic achievement of students in engineering. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39(4), 527-538. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0184.108.40.2067
Hadjar, A., & Aeschlimann, B. (2015) Gender stereotypes and gendered vocational aspirations among Swiss secondary school students. Educational Research, 57(1), 22-42. DOI: 10.1080/00131881.2014.983719
Hooley, T., & Yates, J. (2015). ‘If you look the part you’ll get the job’: Should career professionals help clients to enhance their career image? British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 43(4), 438–451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2014.975676
Houser, B. B., & Garvey, C. (1983). The impact of family, peers, and educational personnel upon career decision making. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 23(1), 35–44.
Kadushin, A. (1976). Men in a woman’s profession. Social Work, 21(6), 440-447. doi: 10.1093/sw/21.6.440.
Korkmaz, M., Alacahan, N. D., Cesim, D. T., Yücel, A. S., & Aras, G. (2013). A comparative study on the employment of women in Turkey and the USA. Turkish Studies, 8 (9), 1845-1863.
Ortiz, V. (1996). Migration and marriage among Puerto Rican women. International Migration Review, 30 (2), 460-484. DOI: 10.2307/2547390
Özyürek, R. (2013). Career psychological counseling theories: Career guidance practices for children and adolescents [Kariyer psikolojik danışmanlığı kuramları: Çocuk ve ergenler için kariyer rehberliği uygulamaları]. Ankara: Nobel Akademi.
Pascall, G., Parker, S., & Evetts, J. (2000). Women in banking careers a science of muddling through? Journal of Gender Studies, 9(1), 63-73. DOI: 10.1080/095892300102461
Reverby, S. (1987). A Caring dilemma: Womanhood and nursing in historical perspective. Nursing Research, 36 (1), 5-11.
Rochlen, A. B., & O'Brien, K. M. (2002). The relation of male gender role conflict and attitudes toward career counseling to interest in and preferences for different career counseling styles. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 3(1), 9-21.
Scholossberg, N. K., & Goodman, J. (1972). A woman’s place: Children’s sex stereotyping Occupations. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 20(4), 266-270.
Shaw, L. J. (1995). Women union electricians: A comparison of job and training experiences of white women and women of color (Unpublished master dissertation). California State University, Long Beach.
Steinmeyer, D. C. (2003). Gender differences in general academic achievement motivation, attribution factors, and career choices in mathematics and in science (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Carolina State University, South Carolina.
Super, D. E. (1990). A life-span, life space approach to career development. In D. Brown, L. Brooks, & Associates, Career choice and development (pp. 197-261). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Swarbrick, A. (1997). Survival in a gendered domain: The strategies of women technologist returners. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 3 (1&2) 77-93. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v3.i1-2.60.
Taylor, E. A., Madill, H. M., & Macnab, D. (1990). Values, salience and job satisfaction: Male and female occupational therapists’ responses. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 10(3), 131-143.
Taylor, L. E. (1995). Joining the old boys' club. Canada & the World Backgrounder, 60(4), 12.
Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi, (2014). Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi milletvekilleri cinsiyete göre dağılımı. retrieved from http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/develop/owa /milletvekillerimiz_sd.dagilim, 10.10.2014
Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu-TÜİK, (2015). Haber Bülteni-İşgücü İstatistikleri Mayıs 2015, retrieved from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=18640, 01.10.2016
Wheeler, K. G. (1983). Comparisons of self-efficacy and expectancy models of occupational preferences for college males and females. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 56(1), 73-78.
Williams, J. E. (1994). Gender differences in high school students' efficacy-expectation/performance discrepancies across four subject matter domains. Psychology in the Schools, 31(3), 232-237.
Zuckerman, D. M. (1981). Family background, sex-role attitudes, and life goals of technical college and university students. Sex Roles, 7 (11), 1109-1126.
Zunker, V.G. (2006). Career counseling: A holistic approach. USA: Thomson Brooks/Cole
Zytowski, D. G. (1969). Toward a theory of career development for women. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 47(7), 660-664.
Pre-service Social Studies Teachers’ Views about the Teaching Knowledge Test
pp. 16-30 | Article Number: ijpe.2017.024
The aim of this study is to determine pre-service social studies teachers’ views about the Teaching Knowledge Test (TKT). The study was conducted within the framework of case-study which is one of the qualitative research methods. The study-group consists of 13 pre-service teachers. Two semi-structured interview forms were used to collect data. Descriptive analysis approach was utilized for the analysis of the collected data. Upon reviewing of the results, it was seen that during the interviews both before and after the exam, pre-service teachers were of the opinion that the content knowledge test should be continued to be conducted; that the number of questions in the exam is not sufficient to measure the content knowledge; that giving weight to undergraduate academic lessons will have an affirmative contribution to this exam.
Keywords: Social studies, Teaching Knowledge Test, teacher training
Arslan, S. & Özpınar, İ. (2008). Teachers qualifications: comparison between primary school curriculum expectations and teachers acquisitions in education faculties. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 38-63.
Atav, E. & Sönmez, S. (2013). The views of teacher candidates about public personnel selection examination (PPSE). H. U. Journal of Education Özel Sayı, (1), 01-13.
Başkan, Z. & Alev, N. (2009). Kamu Personeli Seçme Sınavı’nda çıkan soruların öğretmenlik meslek derslerine göre kapsam geçerliliği. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,11(1), 29-49.
Berliner, D. C. (2005). The near imposibility of testing for teacher quality. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(3), 205-213.
Beşoluk, Ş. & Horzum, M. B. (2011). Prospective teachers’ views regarding pedagogical courses, field knowledge courses and willingness to serve as a teacher. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 44(1), 17-49.
Connelly, F. M., Clandinin, D. J. & He, M. F. (1997). Teachers’ personal practical knowledge on the professional knowledge lanspace. Teaching and Teacher Education,. 13(7), 665-674
Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3th Edition). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Çelikten, M., Şanal M. & Yeni, Ö. Y. (2005). Öğretmenlik mesleği ve özellikleri. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(2), 207-237.
Çimen, O., & Yılmaz, M. (2011). The opinions of the biology teacher candidates about PPSE. Gümüşhane University Electronic Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences, 4, 159-172.
Demir, S. B. ve Bütüner, K. (2014). Investigation of the opinions of pre-service social studies teachers regarding the field test. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 10(2), 113- 128
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks:Sage.
Eraslan, L. (2004). Öğretmenlik mesleğine girişte Kamu Personeli Seçme Sınavı (KPSS) yönteminin değerlendirilmesi. International Journal of Human Sciences,1(1),1-31.
Ercoşkun, M. H. & Nalçacı A. (2009). Investigation of ÖSS, academic and KPSS achievements of classroom teacher candidates as regards various variations. Kastamonu Education Journal, 17(2), 479-486.
Erdem, E. & Soylu, Y. (2013). Prospective teachers’ opinions about CSSE and field examination. Çankırı Karatekin University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 4(1), 223-236.
Glesne, C. (2006). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (3rd ed.). New York: Pearson.
Hancock, B. (1998). An introduction to qualitative research. Leicester on Yell:Trent Focus Group.
Hartley, D. (1998). Repeat Prescription: The national curriculum for initial teacher training, British Journal of Educational Studies, 46(1), 68-83. doi: 10.1111/1467-8527.00071
Karataş, S., & Güleş, H. (2013). Evaluation of the selection exam for civil cervants (KPSS) from pre-service teachers’. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 6(1), 102-119.
Kilimci, S. (2006). The comparison of initial teacher training programmes of Germany, France, England and Turkey. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Çukurova University, Adana.
Koehler, M.J. & Mishra, P. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Koehler, M.J. & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge?. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
Kuran, K. (2012). Teacher candidates’ evaluation of public employee selection examination support classes offered at private teaching institutions. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 9 (18), 143-157.
MEB, 1739 Sayılı Milli Eğitim Temel Kanunu (1973). http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/html/temkanun_1, Erişim Tarihi: 19 Aralık 2013.
MEB,. (2010). IVIII. Milli Eğitim Şura. http://www.meb.gov.tr/duyurular/ duyurular2010/ttkb/ 18Sura_kararlari _tamami.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 05 Ocak 2014.
MEB, Komisyon. (2004). Öğretmenlik mesleği genel yeterlikleri. Ankara: Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve Merkezi Genel Müdürlüğü.
MEB, Komisyon. (2008). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmeni özel alan yeterlikleri. Ankara: Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve Merkezi Genel Müdürlüğü.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research (Third Edition). San Francisco: A Wiley Imprint.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis. London: Sage.
Özkan, S. & Bağçeci, B. (2015). An examınatıon of KPSS content knowledge test wıthın the scope of Turkısh teachıng program and specıalty competencıes. Turkish Studies, 10(11), 1231-1250. doi:Number:http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.8614
Öztürk, C. (2006). Sosyal bilgiler: Toplumsal yaşama disiplinler arası bir bakış. Cemil Öztürk (Ed.). Hayat bilgisi ve sosyal bilgiler öğretimi yapılandırıcı bir yaklaşım (s. 1-30). (3. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Safran, M., Kan, A., Üstündağ, M. T., Birbudak, T. S. & Yıldırım, O. (2014). An investigation of KPSS 2013 results in terms of candidate teachers’ fields. Education and Science, 39(171), 13-25.
Sezgin & Duran, (2011). The reflections of the public personnel selection examination on teacher candidates’ academic and social lives. TSA, 15(3), 9-22.
Stephens, P. & Crawley, T. (2002). Becoming an effective teacher. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
Şimşek, N. & Akgün, İ. H. (2014). The view of pre-service teachers of social studies about teacher-content knowledge exam in KPSS, International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 5(15), 82-100.
Şişman, M. (2001). Öğretmenliğe giriş. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Yaylacı, F. (2013). Approach problem for teachers to develop themselves. Uşak University Journal of Social Sciences, Özel sayı (14), 25-40.
Yeşil, R., Korkmaz, Ö. & Kaya, S. (2009). The effect of the academic achievement in educational faculty on achievement in the public personnel selection examination. Fırat University Journal of Social Sciences, 19(2), 149-160.
Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (8. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.
Yiğit, N. & Alev, N. (2015). Analyzing questions for physics teachers in PPSE subject matter test in terms of special subject matter competencies. Journal of Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education, 4 (1), 13-18.
The Examining Reading Motivation of Primary Students in the Terms of Some Variables
Merve Ataş Bıyık, Tolga Erdoğan & Mustafa Yıldız
pp. 31-49 | Article Number: ijpe.2017.025
The purpose of this research, is to examine reading motivation of the primary 2, 3 and 4th grade students in the terms of gender, class and socioeconomic status. Research is structured according to model of survey in the descriptive type. In the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data “mix method”. The sample consists of total of 769 students studying in the same province including class 2, 3 and 4 in three different schools. Research data is collected by scale of Motivation to Read Profile. According to the survey results, however students' value of reading is affected class and gender variables, students' value of reading is not affected by socioeconomic status. The value of reading of 3rd grade students is higher than 4th grade students. The value of reading of girls is higher than male students. Self-concept as reader and reading motivation of students variate depend on class, gender and socioeconomic status. In addition, reading motivation of 2nd grade students is higher than the 4th grade students. Self-concept as reader and reading motivation of students having upper socioeconomic status are than self-concept as reader and reading motivation of students having lower and middle socioeconomic status.
Keywords: reading, motivation, reading motivation, self-concept as a reader, value of reading
Akyol, H. (2011). Türkçe ilk okuma yazma öğretimi. (10. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Akyol, H. (2009). İlköğretimde Türkçe öğretimi. (2. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Atkinson, R. T., Atkinson, R. C. & Hilgard, E. R. (1995). Psikolojiye giriş (Çev: Atakay, K., Atakay, M. ve Yavuz, A.) İstanbul: Sosyal Yayınları.
Baker, L. & Wigfield A. (1999). Dimensions of children’s motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, ss. 1-45.
Balaban, J. (2006). Öğrenmede güdülenme. Y. Kuzgun ve D. Deryakulu, (Ed.), Eğitimde bireysel farklılıklar içinde (s. 169-199). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
Ciampa, K. (2012). Electronic storybooks: A constructivist approach to improving reading motivation in grade 1 Students. Canadian Journal of Education, 35(4), 92-136.
Cloer, T. & Dalton, S. R.(1999). Gender and grade differences in motivation to read. American Reading Forum Yearbook Online. Retrieved April 16, 2013 from www.fd.appstate.edu/arfonline/99_arfyearbook/pdf/14_cloerrevised_99.pdf
Cloer, C. T., Jr. & Pearman, B. (1993). The relationship of gender to attitudes about academic and recreational reading. In B. Hayes and K. Camperell (Eds.), Reading: Strategies, practices and research for the 21st century (pp. 117-128). Logan, Utah: American Reading Forum.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Araştırma deseni, nitel, nicel ve karma yöntem yaklaşımları. (Çev. E. Bukova Güzel, İ. Erdoğan, Y. Dede, G. Hacıömeroğlu, H. Ercan, F. I. Bilican, M. Bütün, M. Bursal, S. Şahin Mandacı, S. B. Demir). Ankara: Eğiten Kitap.
Demirel, Ö. (2003). Türkçe ve sınıf öğretmenleri için Türkçe öğretimi. (5. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Dökmen, Ü. (1994). Okuma becerisi, ilgisi ve alışkanlığı üzerine bir araştırma. İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları.
Dweck, C. S. & Elliott, E. S. (2005). Competence and motivation. In C. S Dweck & E. S Elliott (Eds.). Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 3-15). New York: Guilford Press.
Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A. & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 1017-1095). New York: Wiley.
Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D. & Blumenfeld, P. B. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s achievement self and task perceptions during elemantary school. Child Development, 64, 830-847.
Eccles, J. S. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Eds.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75-146). San Francisco: Freeman.
Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the achiever: The structure of adolescents’ academic achievement related-beliefs and self-perceptions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215-225.
Edmunds, K. M. & Bauserman, K. L. (2006). What teachers can learn about reading motivation through conversations with children. The Reading Teacher, 59, 5, 414-424.
Gambrell, L. B., Palmer, B. M., Codling, R. M. & Mazzoni, S. S. (1996) Assessing motivation to read. The Reading Teacher, 49(7), 518-533.
Guthrie, J. T. & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, (pp. 403-422). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Güneş, M. (1997). İlkokul öğrencilerinin okuma düzeyleri ve dikkat özelliklerinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
İleri, Z. (2011). Ekrandan okumanın ilköğretim 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin okuduğunu anlama ve okuma motivasyonu düzeylerin etkisi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sakarya.
Jones, T. & Brown, C. (2011). Reading engagement: A comparison between e-books and traditional print books in an elementary classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 4(2), 5-21.
Kush, J.C., & Watkins, M.W. (1996). Long-term stability of children’s attitudes toward reading. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 315-319.
Madden, H. A., Slavin, R. E., Karweit, N. L., Dolan, L. J., & Wasik, B. A. (1993). Success for all: Longitudinal effects of a restructuring program for inner city elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 123-148.
Mckenna, M.C., Kear, D.J. & Ellsworth, R.A. (1995). Children's attitudes toward reading: A National Survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30 (4), 934-956.
Nurmi, J. E., & Aunola, K. (2005). Task-motivation during the first school years: A person-oriented approach to longitudinal data. Learning and Instruction, 15, 103-122.
Sancı, D. (2002). İlköğretim 6. sınıf öğrencilerinin toplumsal, ekonomik ve kültürel durumlarının okuma motivasyonlarına etkisi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum.
Stipek, D. J. & Mac Iver, D. (1989). Developmental change in children’s assessment of intellectual competence. Child Development, 60, 521-538.
Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (8. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Yıldız, M. (2010). İlköğretim 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin okuduğunu anlama, okuma motivasyonu ve okuma alışkanlıkları arasındaki ilişki. Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Yıldız, M. (2013). Adaptation of the motivation to read profile to Turkish. International Journal of Academic Research (Part B), 5(4), 196-199.
Yıldız, M. (2013). İlköğretim 3, 4 ve 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin okuma motivasyonlarının incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38 (168), 260-271.
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J., Harold-Goldsmith, R., Blumenfeld, P., Yoon, K. S. & Freedman-Doan, C. (1989, April). Gender anda age differences in children’s achievement self-perceptions during elemantary school. Biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Kansas C.
Views of Classroom Teachers Concerning Students with Reading Difficulties
Zehra Esra Ketenoğlu Kayabaşı
pp. 50-60 | Article Number: ijpe.2017.026
This study aimed to try to understand the views and attitudes of classroom teachers concerning students with reading difficulties. Data was collected using the semi-structured interview technique, which is among the qualitative data collection techniques. The researcher prepared a semi-structured interview with 5 questions to be addressed to classroom teachers. The findings were assessed under the headings “determination of reading difficulties”, “reasons for reading difficulties”, “effect of reading difficulties”, “methods used by teachers to cope with reading difficulties” and “expectations of help”. Teachers generally stated that they determined the presence of reading difficulties through knowing students’ families, their own occupational experiences, students who were behind in class and the characteristics of their students. They associated the reasons for students having reading difficulties primarily with familial problems and then mental and psychological problems. They generally cope with reading difficulties by offering extra classes and giving homework. Teachers state that it is noteworthy that families often request cooperation. Considering the findings of this study, teachers think that the parents of students are central to the reasons behind and solutions to reading difficulties. Moreover, it is seen that children with reading difficulties are exposed to bullying by peers despite all efforts to create a positive classroom environment.
Keywords: Reading difficulties, views of primary teachers, qualitative research
Akyol, H. (2013). Türkçe ilk okuma yazma öğretimi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Altun, T. , Ekiz, D. & Odabaşı, M. (2011). Sınıf öğretmenleri̇ni̇n sınıflarında karşılaştıkları okuma güçlükleri̇ne i̇li̇şki̇n ni̇tel bi̇r araştırma. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17, 80-101.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (5th Edition). Washington, DC.
Ateş, S., Yıldırım, K., & Yıldız, M. (2010). Opinions of classroom teachers and prospective classroom teachers about the learning difficulties encountered in the teaching process of reading and writing. Elementary Education Online, 9(1), 44–51.
Cooper, H., Civey, J. & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76, 1-62.
Çaycı, B. & Demir, M. K. (2006). Okuma ve anlama sorunu olan öğrenciler üzerine karşılaştırmalı bir çalışma. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(4), 437-456.
Çeliktürk Sezgin, B. & Akyol, H. (2015). Okuma güçlüğü olan dördüncü sınıf öğrencisinin okuma becerilerinin geliştirilmesi. Turkish Journal of Education, 4(2), 4-16.
Duran, E. & Sezgin,B. (2012). Rehberli okuma yönteminin akıcı okumaya etkisi. GEFAD/GUJGEF, 32(3), 633-655.
Dündar, H. & Akyol, H. (2014). Okuma ve anlama problemlerinin tespiti ve giderilmesine i̇lişkin örnek olay çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(171), 361-377.
Harris, A.J. & Sipay, E.R., (1990). How to increase reading ability. (Ninth Edition). New York: Longman.
Kurtdede Fidan, N. & Akyol, H. (2011). Hafif düzeyde zihinsel öğrenme güçlüğü olan bir öğrencinin okuma ve anlama becerilerini geliştirmeye yönelik nitel bir çalışma. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 4 (2), 16-29.
Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel Araştırma Desen ve Uygulama İçin Bir Rehber. (Çev. Edt.) Turan, S. Ankara: Nobel.
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB). (2006). Özel Eğitim Hizmetleri Yönetmeliği, 31.05.2006 tarih ve 26184 sayılı Resmî Gazete, Web Adresi: http://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2012_10/10111226_ozel_egitim_hizmetleri_yonetmeligi_son.pdf
Özkara, Y. (2010). Okuma güçlüğü olan öğrenci̇leri̇n okuma düzeyleri̇ni̇n geli̇şti̇ri̇lmesi̇ne yöneli̇k bi̇r uygulama. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5, 109-119.
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel Araştırma ve Değerlendirme Yöntemleri. (Çev. Edt.) Bütün, M. & Demir, S. B. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Rasinski, T., Padak. N. D. & Fawcett, G. (2010). Teaching children who find reading difficult. Boston: Alyyn & Bacon.
Razon, N. (1982) Okuma Güçlükleri, Eğitim ve Bilim Dergisi, 39,19-29.
Sidekli, S. (2010). Eylem Araştırması: İlköğretim Dördüncü Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Okuma ve Anlama Güçlüklerinin Giderilmesi. Türklük Bilimi Araştırmaları, 27: 563-580.
Sidekli, S. & Yangın, S. (2005). Okuma Güçlüğü Olan Ogrencilerin Okuma Becerilerinin Geliştirilmesine Yönelik Bir Uygulama. Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 11: 393- 413.
Sucuoğlu, B., Diken, I. H., Demir, S., Unlu, E. & Sen, A. (2010). Özel Eğitim Terimler Sözlüğü. Ankara: Maya Akademi.
Taşkaya, S. M. (2010). Okuma problemlerinin giderilmesinde renkli metinlerin etkisi. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29 (2), 21-36. Yıldız, M. (2013). Okuma Motivasyonu, Akıcı Okuma ve Okuduğunu Anlamanın Besinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Akademik Başarılarındaki Rolü. Turkish Studies. 8 (4): 1461-1478.
Yıldız, M. & Akyol, H. (2011). İlköğretim 5. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Okuduğunu Anlama, Okuma Motivasyonu ve Okuma Alışkanlıkları Arasındaki İlişki. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31 (3), 793-815.
Yüksel, A. (2010). Okuma güçlüğü çeken bir öğrencinin okuma becerisinin geliştirilmesine yönelik bir çalışma. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 3(1), 124-134.
Policy Debate in Ethiopian Teacher Education: Retrospection and Future Direction
Aweke Shishigu, Eyasu Gemechu, Kassa Michael, Mulugeta Atnafu & Yenealem Ayalew
pp. 61-70 | Article Number: ijpe.2017.027
Though, Ethiopia registered an extraordinary achievement in terms of increasing student enrolment, still quality of education remains a challenge and is becoming a bottleneck. One of the problems might be the structure and nature of teacher education itself. The purpose of this study therefore was to critically examine the existing literature and policy documents and come up with effective as well as valuable modality of teacher education which will be workable in Ethiopian context. In Ethiopia, there are two extreme views that can be taken as challenges for teacher education program: pedagogical knowledge vs. subject matter knowledge. There is also contention on the modality of teacher education: concurrent vs. consecutive. The study show that the greatest ever challenge in teacher education is registered during the Post-TESO period. The program is troubled. Based on the results of this study, imperative implications for practice are forwarded.
Keywords: teacher education, concurrent model, consecutive model, driving force, curriculum structure
Aklilu, D., Alemayehu, T., & Mekasha, K. (2008). The structure and content of secondary school teacher education program: International and national experiences. Journal of education for development volume II, No. 2
Apple, M. (2003).The State and the Politics of Knowledge, London: Routledge Falmer.
Aweke, S. (2015).Factors Affecting Teachers Motivation and Professionalism: The Case of Public Primary Schools in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies, volume 3, issue 8.
Bell, L. & Stevenson, H. (2006); Education Policy: Process, Themes and Impact. Routledge: the Tailor &Fransis group.
Brown, E., G. (2011). A History of Policies and Forces Shaping California Teacher Credentialing: Retrieved from http://www.ctc.ca.gov/commission/files/ctc-history.pdf
CME, (2008).Council of Ministers of Education: Teacher Education & Development Study in Mathematics.Council of Ministers of Education, Canada, Toronto, Ontario M4V 1N6.
Dejene, N. (2015). Changes in Ethiopian teacher’ training program and its implication on quality, Proceedings of the 33rd may annual international educational conference, Bahirdar University, Ethiopia.
ESDP IV. (2010). Education Sector Development Program IV. The Federal Ministry of Education, Addis Ababa, (2010/11-2014/15).
ETP. (1994): The Ethiopian education and training policy. Addis Ababa, St. George Printing Press.
Dahlström, L. (2007). When eagles are allowed to fly – a global and contextual perspective on teacher education in Ethiopia. International Journal of Progressive Education, 3(3), 6-19.
Kassa, M. (2015). Integrating Content, Pedagogy and Technology for Enhancing Quality of Education. Paper presented at the The 5th Annual International Conference on Quality Education, Mekele University.
Kedir, A. (2007). Clinging to the managerial approach in implementing teacher education ‘reform’ tasks in Ethiopia. International Journal of Progressive Education, Volume 3 Number 3.
Koye, K., &Yonas, A. (2013). Practices and Challenges of Post-Graduate Diploma in Teaching Program: The Case of Haram University, Ethopia. An international multi-disciplinary peer reviewed journal, volume II, Issue IV.
Koye, K. (2014). Attitude of Postgraduate Diploma in Teaching (PGDT) Student Teachers towards Teaching Profession in Ethiopian University College of Teacher Education. Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research, Issue 7
Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science. Harper and Row: New York.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge’. Teachers College Record, 108 (6), pp. 1017–1054.
MoE, (2003). Hand book of TESO. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
MoE, (2009). A Curriculum Framework for Secondary School Teacher EducationProgram in Ethiopia.
MOE, (2012). Professional Standard for Ethiopian School Teachers
Mulkeen, A., D., DeJaeghere, J., Leu, E., & Bryner, K. (2005).Recruiting, Retaining and Retraining Secondary School Teachers and Principals in Sub-Saharan Africa: GEC Working Paper Series. The World Bank and AED
Sarson, S. (1990). The Predictable Failure of Educational Reform. San Francisco: CA, Josse—Boss.
Schwille, J., Tatto, T., M., Rowley, M., Peck, R., and Senk, L.S. (2013). An Analysis of Teacher Education Context, Structure, and Quality- Assurance Arrangements in TEDS-M Countries.International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).Australian Council for Educational ResearchMichigan State University.
Shulman, S. L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundation of the new reform. Harvard education review, volume 57, No 1
Shulman, S. L. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, Vol. 15, No. 2
Tesfaye, S. (2008). Teacher education at cross roads: how should Ethiopian secondary school teachers be trained? Journal of education for development Volume II. No 1.
Tesfaye, S. (2014) Teacher preparation in Ethiopia: a critical analysis ofreforms, Cambridge Journal of Education, 44:1, 113-145, DOI: 10.1080/0305764X.2013.860080
UNESCO, (1990). Innovations and initiatives in teacher education in Asia and the pacific region, Volume2: case studies. Bangkok
Worku, F. (2015). Evaluative Research of the Mentoring Process of the PGDT (With Particular Reference to Cluster Centers under Jimma University Facilitation). Education, 5(1): 1-8 DFD
Leadership in Academic Institutions; Preparing Students Holistically for Life: Matters of the Heart and Mind
Alessandra Sax & Stefanos Gialamas
pp. 71-78 | Article Number: ijpe.2017.028
Students spend most hours of their day within Academic Institutions in their classrooms and/or after school and weekend activities. They are able to acquire knowledge and skills needed to be academically, socially, emotionally and physically well. All of these factors contribute to holistic growth and development. However, social and emotional intelligence are key ingredients to an individual’s ability to adjust and interact with others in rapidly changing societies. Therefore, the experiences that students have with their administrators, teachers, peers and parents, while at school are essential to the holistic development of one’s academic, social, emotional skills and interpersonal relations. The authors define holistically, as the development and growth of students: intellectually, socially, emotionally, physically and ethically. The following discussion points to the importance in fostering social-emotional intelligence in all stakeholders alike, in the school-setting and in finding an equilibrium in authentic leadership by demonstrating agility with school policies and processes when one’s wisdom and genuine care can prevail; thus referring to matters of the heart and mind. Therefore, the authors are addressing the fundamental question, What type of institutional leadership does an academic institution need in order to prepare students holistically for life and to develop them to become tomorrow’s leaders?
Keywords: international schools, globalization, change facilitators, school principals, leadership styles, emotional intelligence, DiSC Model of Behavior, holistic development
Avgerinou, M.D., & Gialamas, S.P. (2016). Revolutionizing K-12 blended Learning through the i²Flex classroom model (pp. 1-300). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0267-8
Baker, J. A., Dilly, J., Aupperlee, J. L., & Patil, S. A. (2003). The developmental context of school satisfaction: Schools as psychologically healthy environments. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 206–221.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss, Vol.1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
Collaborative for Academic, Social and Emotional Learning (2013). Safe and Sound: An educational leader’s guide to evidence-based social and emotional learning programs. Chicago: Author.
Gialamas, S. &Pelonis, P. (2009). Morphosis leadership being visionariesnina changing world. Academic Leadership Online, 7(2). http://www.academicleadership.org/37/morphosis-leadershipbeingvisionaries-in-a-changing-world/
Gialamas. S. (2014). Educational institutions for a humanistic world. May 12: ekatheimerini.com.
Greenberg, M. T., Weissberg, R. P., O’Brien, M. U., Zins, J. E., Fredericks, L., Resnik, H., & Elias, M. J. (2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. The American Psychologist, 58(6-7), 466–474.
Hall, G., Hord, S.M. (2011). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education Inc.
Harvard Business Review (2011). On Leadership. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). (2014). Perceptions and definitions of social responsibility. Winnipeg, Canada: IISD. Available at http://www.iisd.org
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). (2014). Perceptions and definitions of social responsibility. Winnipeg, Canada: IISD. Available at http://www.iisd.org
Marston, W. M. (1928). The emotions of normal people. New York: Kegan Paul Trench Trubner And Company., Limited.
SEDL (2011), Leadership characteristics that facilitate school change. Retrieved on March 29, 2011 from http://www.sedl.org/change/leadership/character.html
Zins, J. E., & Elias, M. J. (2006). Social and emotional learning. In G. Bear & K. Minke (Eds.), Children’s needs III. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
The Effect of Teacher and Student Characteristics on TIMSS 2011 Mathematics Achievement of Fourth-and Eighth-Grade Students in Turkey
Seher Yalçın, Rahime Nükhet Demirtaşlı, Munevver Ilgun Dibek & Hatice Cigdem Yavuz
pp. 79-94 | Article Number: ijpe.2017.029
This study investigated effect of student- and school-level variables on mathematics achievement of fourth- and eighth-grade students using the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2011 data of Turkey. The common variables addressed in student and school questionnaires were compared. Due to nested structure of the TIMSS data, hierarchical linear modeling analysis was performed. According to findings of the study, for both grade levels, of all teacher-related variables, only school emphasis on academic success were discovered to have statistically significant impact on schools’ mean mathematics achievements. Moreover, concerning student-level variables, being bullied at school, confidence in mathematics, being engaged in mathematics and parental involvement had statistically significant effect on students’ mathematics achievement for both grade levels. It is considered that students that hold more positive perceptions of their school and have teachers that are willing to improve themselves in their career tend to have higher performance in TIMSS.
Keywords: This study investigated effect of student- and school-level variables on mathematics achievement of fourth- and eighth-grade students using the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2011 data of Turkey. The common variables addressed in
Al-Hebaish, S. M. (2012). The correlation between general self-confidence and academic achievement in the oral presentation course. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(1), 60-65. doi:10.4304/tpls.2.1.60-65.
Anderman, L. H. (2003). Academic and social perceptions as predictors of change in middle school students’ sense of school belonging. Journal of Experimental Education, 72, 5–23.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45 , 369–386. doi: 10.1002/pits.20303.
Arıkan, S., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Yağmur, K. (2016). Factors contributing to mathematics achievement differences of Turkish and Australian students in TIMSS 2007 and 2011. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(8), 2039-2059. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1268a
Aslan, B. (2015). A comparative study on the teaching profession in Turkey and South Korea: Secondary analysis of TALIS 2008 data in relation to teacher selfefficacy. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 61, 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.61.1
Bernard, B. (2004). Resiliency: What we have learned. San Francisco,CA: WestEd.
Burns, D., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). Teaching around the world: What can TALIS tell us? Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
Burton, L. (2004). Confidence is everything: Perspectives of teachers and students on learning mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 357-381. doi:10.1007/s10857-004-3355-y
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakan, M., Tan, Ş., & Atar, H. Y. (2014a). TIMSS 2011 ulusal matematik ve fen raporu 4. Sınıflar (TIMSS 2011 national mathematics and science report 4th grades). Ankara: İşkur Matbaacılık.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakan, M., Tan, Ş., & Atar, H. Y. (2014b). TIMSS 2011 ulusal matematik ve fen raporu 8. Sınıflar (TIMSS 2011 national mathematics and science report 8th grades). Ankara: İşkur Matbaacılık.
Chen, Q. (2014). Using TIMSS 2007 data to build mathematics achievement model of fourth graders in Hong Kong and Singapore. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 1519–1545. doi:10.1007/s10763-013-9505-x
Cowie, H. (2013). The immediate and long-term effects of bullying. In I. Rivers & N. Duncan (Ed), Bullying: Experiences and Discourses of Sexuality and Gender (vol.I, pp.10-18). Newyork, NY: Routledge.
Dinham, S. (1993). Teachers under stress. Australian Educational Researcher, 20(3), 1-16. doi:10.1007/BF03219547
Erdogan, C. & Demirkasimoglu, N. (2010). Ailelerin eğitim sürecine katılımına ilişkin öğretmen ve yönetici görüşleri (Teachers’ and school administrators’ views of parent involvement in education process). Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 16(3), 399-431.
Fan, X. & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students' academic achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1-22. doi:10.1023/A:1009048817385
Fishman, J. A. & Galguera T. (2003). Introduction to test construction in social and sciences. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Goddard, Y. L., Goddard, R. D., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2007). A theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 109(4), 877–896.
Graven, M. (2004). Investigating mathematics teacher learning within an in-service community of practice: The centrality of confidence. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57(2), 177-211. doi:10.1023/B:EDUC.0000049277.40453.4
Güzeller, C. O., Eser, M. T., & Aksu, G. (2016). Study of the factors affecting the mathematics achievement of Turkish students according to data from the programme for international student assessment (PISA) 2012. International Journal of Progressive Education, 12(2), 78-89.
Hannula, M. S., Maijala, H., & Pehkonen, E. (2004). Development of understanding and self-confidence in mathematics; grades 5–8. In M. J. Høines, & A.B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, (pp. 17–24). Bergen: PME.
Hawker, D. S. J., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychsocial maladjustment: a meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 41(4), 441–455. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00629
Hill, N. E., & Taylor, L. C. (2004). Parent-school involvement and children’s academic achievement: Pragmatics and issues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4), 161–164. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00298.x
Hirsch, E. & Church, K. (2009). North Carolina teacher working conditions survey brief: Teacher working conditions are student learning conditions. Retrieved from www.newteachercenter.org
Hoge, D. R., Smit, E., & Crist, J. T. (1997). Four family process factors predicting academic achievement for sixth and seventh grade. Educational Research Quarterly, 21(2), 27-42.
Jeynes, W. (2012). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of different types of parental involvement programs for urban students. Urban Education, 47(4), 706–742. doi: 10.1177/0042085912445643
Jerrim, J. (2014). Why do East Asian children perform so well in PISA? An investigation of Western-born children of East Asian descent (Report No. 14-16). London: University College London Press. Retrived from http://repec.ioe.ac.uk/REPEc/pdf/qsswp1416.pdf
Johnson, S. M. (2006). The workplace matters: Teacher quality, retention and effectiveness (NEA Best Practices Working Paper). Washington, DC: NEA.
Joncas, M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 target populations. In Martin, M. O. & Mullis, I. V. S. (Eds.), Methods and procedures in TIMSS and PIRLS 2011 (pp. 1-21). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
Ker, H. W. (2013). Trend analysis on mathematics achievements: A comparative study using TIMSS data. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 200-203. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2013.010309
Kilic, S., & Askin, O. E. (2013). Parental influence on students’ mathematics achievement: The comparative study of Turkey and best performer countries in TIMSS 2011. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 2000-2007. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.228
Lai, S. F. Ye, R., & Chang, K. P. (2008). Bullying in middle schools: An Asian-Pacific regional study. Asia Pacific Education Review, 9 (4), 393–405. doi:10.1007/BF03025666
Leithwood, K. (2007). Teacher working conditions that matter: Evidence for change. Education Canada, 47(2), 42-45.
Liang, J. & Jia, D. (2015). Teachers’ influence to the mathematics achievement of grade four students. In X.M. Zhang & F.L. Wang (Ed.), Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Education, Management and Information Technology (pp.411-416).China: Atlantis Press.
Marcondes, M. I. (1999). Teacher education in Brazil. Journal of Education for Teaching, 25(3), 203-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02607479919493
McLaughlin, M. W. & Talbert, J. E. (2006). Building school-based learning communities: Professional strategies to improve student achievement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2010). PISA 2009 uluslararası öğrenci değerlendirme projesi, ulusal ön rapor (Program for international student assessment PISA 2009, national report). Ankara: Eğitim Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dairesi Yayınları.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2003). Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation, results from PISA 2000. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
OECD (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. Paris, France: OECD Publishing
Oloube, N. P. (2005). Benchmarking the motivational competencies of academically qualified reachers and professionally qualified teachers in Nigerian secondary schools. The Africian Symposium, 5(3), 17–37.
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying in school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
Park, S. Y. (2005). Student engagement and classroom variables in improving mathematics achievement. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6(1), 87-97. doi:10.1007/BF03024970
Pang, M. F. (2006). The use of learning study to enhance teacher professional learning in Hong Kong. Teaching Education, 17(1), 27-42. doi:10.1080/10476210500527915
Ponzo, M. (2013). Does bullying reduce educational achievement? An evaluation using matching estimators. Journal of Policy Modeling, 35(6), 1057–1078. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2013.06.002
Raudenbush, S. W. & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Sarı, M. (2012). Sense of school belonging among elementary school students. Çukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 41(1), 1-11.
Shute, V. J., Hansen, E. G., Underwood, J. S., & Razzouk, R. (2011). A review of the relationship between parental involvement and secondary school students' academic achievement. Education Research International, 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/915326.
Sturman, L., Burge, B., Cook, R., & Weaving, H. (2012). TIMSS 2011: Mathematics and science achievement in England. Slough: NFER
Tavşancıl, E. & Yalçın, S. (2015). A determination of Turkish student’s achievement using hierarchical linear models in trends in international mathematics-science study (TIMSS) 2011. Anthropologist, 22(2), 390-396.
Taylor, L. & Parsons, J. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14(1). Retrieved from http://cie.asu.edu/
Thomson, S., Hillman, K., & Wernert, N. (2012). Monitoring Australian Year 8 student achievement internationally: TIMSS 2011. Australian Council for Educational Research, Australia.
Topor, D. R., Keane, S. P., Shelton, T. L., & Calkins, S. D. (2010). Parental involvement and student academic performance: A multiple mediational analysis. Journal of Preventation and Intervention Community, 38(3), 183-197. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2010.486297
Wagemaker. H. (2003, July). IEA: International studies, impact and transition. Paper presented in the 4th IEA International Research Conference. Gothenburg, Sweden. Retrieved from http://www.iea.nl/irc-2010.html.
Wang, Z., Osterlind, S. J., & Bergin, D. A. (2012). Building mathematics achievement models in four countries using TIMSS 2003. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(5), 1- 28. doi 10.1007/s10763-011-9328-6
Willms, J. (2003). Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation results from PISA 2000. Paris, France: OECD.
Yavuz, H. Ç., Demirtaşlı, R. N., Yalçın, S., & İlgün Dibek, M. (2017). The effects of student and teacher level variables on TIMSS 2007 and 2011 mathematics achievement of Turkish students. Education and Science, 42(189), 27-47. doi: 10.15390/EB.2017.6885
Yıldırım, H. H., Yıldırım, S., Ceylan, E., & Yetişir, I. (2013). Türkiye Perspektifinden TIMSS 2011 Sonuçları (Results of TIMSS 2011 from Turkey’s perspective). May, TEDMEM Analiz Dizisi I, Ankara.
Yıldırım, O. & Demir-Bilican, S. (2014). The examination of teacher and student effectiveness at TIMSS 2011 science and math scores using multi level models. Pakistan Journal of Statistics, 30(6), 1211-1218.
Zhu, Y., & Leung, F. K. S. (2010). Motivation and achievement: Is there an East Asian model? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(5), 1189–1212. doi: 10.1007/s10763-010-9255-y
A Case Study of Preservice Science Teachers with Different Argumentation Understandings: Their Views and Practices of Using Representations in Argumentation
pp. 95-111 | Article Number: ijpe.2017.030
Representations are fundamental tools to support argumentation in science learning. However, little is known about how preservice science teachers (PSTs) with different argumentation understandings view and use representations in argumentation. Therefore, the purpose of this case study was to explore the views and practices of PSTs’ use of representations for argumentation purposes. The participants were 6 graduate students enrolled in an argumentation course in a northeastern university in Turkey. Data was collected through videotaped lessons, learners’ artifacts and semi-structured interviews. Video analysis and content analysis were used to investigate research questions. Results indicated that with the increased argumentation understandings PSTs showed a sophisticated understanding of using representations for argumentation. Moreover, with the increased argumentation understanding PSTs a) used representations for multiple purposes during argumentation and b) used visual-graphical representations as rebuttals and counterarguments. Implications include the explicit teaching of the purpose of multiple representations in argumentation, integration of representational and argumentation practices in teacher education programs, and enriching argumentation experiences by providing students with multiple representations.
Keywords: science education; argumentation; multiple representations
ACARA, Australian Curriculum, A. and R., & Authority. (2012). The Australian curriculum: Science (Version 3.0). Commonwealth of Australia: Sydney, NSW.
Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers & Education, 33(2–3), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00029-9
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Avraamidou, L., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2005). Giving priority to evidence in science teaching: A first-year elementary teacher’s specialized practices and knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(9), 965–986. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20081
Aydeniz, M., & Dogan, A. (2016). Exploring the impact of argumentation on pre-service science teachers’ conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17, 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00170F
Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900412284
Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education. Science Education, 92(3), 473–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20278
Cetin, P. S., Erduran, S., & Kaya, E. (2010). Understanding the nature of chemistry and argumentation : the case of pre-service chemistry teachers. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(4), 41–59.
Cho, K.-L., & Jonassen, D. H. (2002). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505022
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
DiSessa, A. (2004). Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(3), 293–331. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2203_2
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.3.CO;2-1
Erduran, S., Ardac, D., & Yakmaci-Guzel, B. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Case studies of pre-service secondary science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(2), 1–14.
Evagorou, M., & Osborne, J. (2013). Exploring young students’ collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 209–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21076
Evans, J. S. B. T., & Thompson, V. a. (2004). Informal reasoning: theory and method. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(2), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0085797
Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. In The Sage Qualitative Resaerch Kit. London: Sage.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Günel, M., Memiş, E. ., & Büyükkasap, E. (2010). Yaparak yazarak bilim öğrenimi-YYBÖ yaklaşımının ilköğretim öğrencilerinin fen akademik başarısına ve fen ve teknoloji dersine yönelik tutumuna etkisi. Education and Science, 35, 155.
Hand, B., & Choi, A. (2010). Examining the impact of student use of multiple modal representations in constructing arguments in organic chemistry laboratory classes. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9155-8
Hogan, K., & Thomas, D. (2001). Cognitive comparisons of students’ systems modeling in ecology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(4), 319–345. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012243102249
Isbilir, E., Cakiroglu, J., & Ertepinar, H. (2014). Pre-service science teachers’ written argumentation qualities: From the perspectives of socio-scientific issues, epistemic belief levels and online discussion environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(5), 371–381. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1110a
Kaya, E. (2013). Argumentation practices in classroom: Pre-service teachers’ conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7), 1139–1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.770935
Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00021-X
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lin, T.-C., Lin, T.-J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Research trends in science education from 2008 to 2012: A systematic content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 36(8), 1346–1372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.864428
Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels. Cognition and Instruction, 14(2), 139–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1402_1
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2013). İlköğretim kurumları fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı. Ankara: Talim Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290570
NGSS Leads States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Ogan-Bekiroǧlu, F., & Aydeniz, M. (2013). Enhancing Pre-service Physics Teachers’ Perceived Self-efficacy of Argumentation-based Pedagogy through Modelling and Mastery Experiences. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(3), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.9
Oliveira, D. K. B. S., Justi, R., & Mendonça, P. C. C. (2015). The Use of Representations and Argumentative and Explanatory Situations. International Journal of Science Education, 693(June), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1039095
Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: the role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science (New York, N.Y.), 328(5977), 463–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183944
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035
Ozdem, Y., Ertepinar, H., Cakiroglu, J., & Erduran, S. (2011). The Nature of Pre-service Science Teachers’ Argumentation in Inquiry-oriented Laboratory Context. International Journal of Science Education, 693(June 2015), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.611835
Pallant, A., & Lee, H.-S. (2015). Constructing scientific arguments using evidence from dynamic computational climate models. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2), 378–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9499-3
Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(4), 405–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2003.09.002
Roth, W., McGinn, M., & Bowen, G. (1998). How prepared are preservice teachers to teach scientific inquiry? Levels of performance in scientific representation practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009465505918
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
Sampson, V., & Blanchard, M. R. (2012). Science teachers and scientific argumentation: Trends in views and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1122–1148. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21037
Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2011). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study. Science Education, 95(2), 217–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20421
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500336957
Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wu, H.-K., & Puntambekar, S. (2012). Pedagogical affordances of multiple external representations in scientific processes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21, 754–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9363-7
Yerrick, R. K. (2000). Lower track cience students ’ argumentation and open inquiry instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 807–838. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200010)37:8<807::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-7
Yeşildağ-Hasançebi̇, F., & Günel, M. (2013). Effects of argumentation based inquiry approach on disadvantaged students’ science achivement. Elementary Education Online, 12(4), 1056–1073. Retrieved from http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr/vol12say4/v12s4m11.pdf
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Zembal-Saul, C., Munford, D., Crawford, B., Friedrichsen, P., & Land, S. (2002). Scaffolding Preservice Science Teachers’ Evidence-Based Arguments During an Investigation of Natural Selection. Research in Science Education, 32(1910), 437–463. https://doi.org/Doi 10.1023/A:1022411822951
Zohar, A. (2008). Science teacher education and professional development in argumentation. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 245–268). Dordrecht: Springer.
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62.
An Examination of the Epistemological Views and Learning Styles of Pre-Service Teachers
Gökhan Güneş, Kaan Batı & Mehmet Katrancı
pp. 112-128 | Article Number: ijpe.2017.031
Epistemology is the branch of philosophy that investigates human knowledge, in particular its source, nature, limitations, system, and accuracy. The most critical issues in epistemology are considered to be belief in the nature of knowledge and belief in the nature of knowing. Since epistemology involves the structuring processes of knowledge, it assumed to be associated with individual differences, which are influential in determining an individual’s ability to organize their thoughts and behaviors as well as personal choices. In addition, the most typical reflections of individual differences are observed in learning styles. Therefore, in this research, we aimed to examine the relationship between the epistemological views and learning styles of pre-service teachers. The study was based on a quantitative design and the epistemological views of the pre-service teachers were determined using the Scientific Epistemological Beliefs Scale developed by Elder (2002) and adapted to Turkish by Acat, Tüken and Karadağ (2010). In addition, the index of learning styles developed by Felder and Soloman (1996) and adapted to Turkish by Samanci and Keskin (2007) was used to identify the participants’ learning styles. A total of 698 pre-service teachers from two state universities in Turkey constituted the sample of the research. According to the overall results, the pre-service teachers adopted philosophical skepticism and were inclined towards an active/sensing/visual/sequential learning style. Furthermore, a statistically significant relationship was found between the participants' learning styles and their epistemological views.
Keywords: Pre-service teachers, epistemological views, learning styles
Anderson, R. (1984). Some reflections on the acquisition of knowledge. Educational Researcher, 13(9), 5-10.
Arnup, J. L., Murrihy, C., Roodenburg, J., & McLean, L. A. (2013). Cognitive style and gender differences in children’s mathematics achievement. Educational Studies, 39(3), 355-368. doi: 10.1080/03055698.2013.767184.
Bochenski, J. M. (2009). Felsefe düşünmenin yolları (1st Ed.). Ankara: BilgeSu.
Brownlee, J., Purdie, N., & Boulton-Lewis, G. (2001). Changing epistemological beliefs in pre-service teacher education students. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 247-268.
Brunsell, E. & Marcks, J. (2005). Identifying a baseline for teachers’ astronomy content knowledge. Astronomy Education Review, 2(3), 38-46.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Veri analizi el kitabı (8. Baskı). Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
Chai, C. S., Khine, M. S., & Teo, T. (2006). Epistemological beliefs on teaching and learning: A survey among pre‐service teachers in Singapore. Educational Media International, 43(4), 285-298.
Cheng, M. M. H., Chan, K-W., Tang, S. Y. F., & Cheng, A. Y. N. (2009). Pre-service teacher education students' epistemological beliefs and their conceptions of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(2), 319-327.
Clark, C. (1988). Asking the rights questions about teacher preparation: Contributions of research on teacher thinking. Educational Researcher, 17, 5-12.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
De Bello, T. C. (1990). Comparison of eleven major learning styles models: Variables, appropriate populations, validity of instrumentation and the research behind them. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International, 6, 203-222.
Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1992). Teaching elementary students through their individual learning styles: Practical approaches for grades 3-6. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Dunn, R. (1986). Learning styles: Link between individual differences and effective instruction. North Carolina Educational Leadership, 2(1), 4 - 22.
Dunn, R., Griggs, S. A., Olson, J. & Beasley, M. (1995). A meta-analytic validation of the Dunn and Dunn model learning-style performances. The Journal of Educational Research, 88(6), 353-363.
Elder, A. D. (2002). Characterizing fifth grade students’ epistemological beliefs in science. In P. R. Pintrich (Eds). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 347–364). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Felder, R. M. (1996). Matters of style. ASEE Prism, 6(4), 23. http://www2.eesc.usp.br/aprende/images/arquivos/Matters_of_Style.pdf.
Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding students’ differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 57-72.
Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.
Felder, R. M., & Soloman, B. A. (1994). Index of learning styles. http://www.ncsu.edu/felder- public/ILSpage.html.
Felkel, B., & Gosky, R. M. (2012). A study of reliability and validity of the Felder-Soloman index of learning styles for business students. Electronic Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Annual International Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematics Orlando, Florida, 22-25 March 2012 (pp. C004).
Fleming, N. D. (2001). Teaching and learning styles: VARK strategies. New Zealand: Christchurch.
Giedd, J. N., Snell, J. W., Lange, N., Rajapakse, J. C., Casey, B. C., Kozuch, P. L., Vaituzis, A. C, Vauss, Y. C., Hamburger, S. D., Kaysen, D., & Rapoport, J. L. (1996). Quantitative imagnetic resonance imaging of human brain development: Ages 4-18. Cerebral Cortex, 6, 551-560.
Grasha, A. F. (1996). Teaching with style. Pittsburgh, PA: Alliance.
Gregorc, A. F. (1979). Learning/teaching styles: Their nature and effects. NASSP Monograph, (October/November), 19–26.
Hawk, T. F., & Shah, A. J. (2007). Using learning styles instruments to enhance student learning. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5(1), 1-19, Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2007.00125.x/pdf.
Healy, J. M. (2004). Your child's growing mind: Brain development and learning from birth to adolescence. New York: Broadway Books.
Hofer, B. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 13, 353-383.
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. (2002). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88-140.
Johnson, B. & Christensen, L. (2014). Nicel, nitel ve karma araştırmalarda örnekleme. In S. B. Demir (Ed.), Eğitim araştırmaları, nicel, nitel ve karma yaklaşımlar, Eğiten Kitap: Ankara.
Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kale, N. (2009). Felsefiyat (1. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning style: an overview. In J. W. Keefe (Ed.), Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs. Reston, Va: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
King, P., & Kitchener, K. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kolb, D. A. (1976). Learning style inventory. Boston, MA: Hay Group, Hay Resource Direct.
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 93–212.
Köklü, N., Büyüköztürk, Ş. & Çokluk-Bökeoğlu, Ö. (2006). Sosyal bilimler için istatistik. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Leite, W. L., Svinicki, M., & Shi, Y. (2010). Attempted validation of the scores of the VARK: Learning styles inventory with multitrait–multimethod confirmatory factor analysis models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(2), 323-339.
Litzinger, T. A., Lee, S. H., Wise, J. C., & Felder, R. M. (2005). A study of the reliability and validity of the Felder-Soloman index of learning styles. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.
Livesay, G. A., Dee, K. C., Nauman, E. A., & Hites , L. S. (2002). Engineering student learning styles: a statistical analysis using Felder’s index of learning styles. In Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Montreal, Quebec.
Miller, R. G. (1969). Simultaneous statistical inference. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 8–14.
Passer, M. W., & Smith, R. E. (2008). The science of mind and behavior (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Perry, W. G. (1999). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.
Perry, W. G. (1981). Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of meaning. In A. W. Chickering & Assoc. (Eds). The modern American college (pp. 76–116). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ravindran, B., Greene, B. A. & DeBacker, T. K. (2005). The role of achievement goals and epistemological beliefs in the prediction of pre-service teacher’s cognitive engagement and application learning. Journal of Educational Research, 98(4), 222-233.
Reiss, A. L., Abrams, M. T., Singer, H. S., Ross, J. L., & Denckla, M. B. (1996). Brain development, gender and IQ in children: A volumetric imaging study. Brain,119, 1763- 1774.
Samancı, N. K. & Keskin, M., Ö. (2007). Felder ve Soloman öğrenme stili indeksi: Türkçeye uyarlanması ve geçerlik-güvenirlik çalışması. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 37-54.
Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498–504.
Schraw, G. (2001). Current themes and future directions in epistemological research: A commentary. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 451-464.
Slaats A., Lodewijks, H. G. L. C., & Van der Sanden, J. M. M. (1999). Learning styles in secondary vocational education: Disciplinary differences. Learning and Instruction, 9, 475-492.
Sönmez, V. (2010). Bilim felsefesi. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Sözer, Ö. (2009). Felsefenin abc’si (4. Baskı). İstanbul: Say Yayınları.
Tekin, H. (1993). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. Ankara: Yargı Yayınevi.
Topdemir, H. G. (2011). Felsefe (2nd Ed). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Van Zwanenberg, N., Wilkinson, L. J., and Anderson, A. (2000). Felder and Silverman’s index of learning styles and Honey and Mumford’s learning styles questionnaire: How do they compare and do they predict academic performance? Educational Psychology, 20(3), 365-380.
Wilson, J. A. R., Robeck, M. C., & Michael, W. B. (1974). Psychological foundations of learning and teaching (2nd Ed). McGraw Hill, New York.
Zywno, M. S. (2003). A contribution of validation of score meaning for Felder-Soloman’s index of learning styles. In Annual Conference of the American Society Engineering Education, Washington, DC.
Teaching Controversial Issues in the JLL Classroom for Chinese Students
pp. 129-139 | Article Number: ijpe.2017.032
This paper discusses how teachers explore teaching controversial issues in the Japanese language classroom to Japanese language learner (JLL) or culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) students who have different cultural and political backgrounds. Assuring educational opportunities with consideration of JLLs’ background is important especially in this globalized world. Students who spent several years in their home countries had missed the earlier part of the culture in the host countries, and they do not internalize host culture fully. Lack of cultural knowledge or literacy would lead to inequality of attainment. The research was conducted in a Japanese language classroom for Chinese from People’s Republic of China (ROC) newcomer students in a commercial night public high school in Japan.
This study examines how a Japanese teacher were aware of the cultural aspects of students, searched for appropriate methods to teach controversial issues. The research methods are participatory observations and semi-structured interviews with teachers. Through interaction with Chinese newcomer students, the Japanese teacher’s cultural and political awareness and political correctness was induced as he observed what the students needed to know and experience. The teacher tried to infuse students with global awareness in his hybrid history embedded Japanese language class. The concept which were not relevant to the political status of the country of origin, neutrality between the country of origin and Japan, were explored during the lessons.
Keywords: controversial issues, Japanese language learner (JLL) students, culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) students, culturally responsiveness, cultural literacy
Banks, J.A. (2012). Multicultural Education: Characteristics and Goals. In Multicultural Education: Issues and Perspectives (pp.3-41). New Jersey: Wiley
Trilling, B & Fadel, C. (2012). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. NY: Jossey-Bass Gay, G. (2010).Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice. NY: Columbia University Press.
Hirsch (1988). Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know. New York: Vintage
Kawasaki, S. (2011). Tabunka-kyoiku to Hawaii no Ibunkarikai-gakushu (Multicultural Education and Intercultural Lessons in Hawaii). Kyoto: Nakanishi-ya Shuppan).
Krashen, S.D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. NY: Longman
Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The Dreamkeepers: Successful Teachers of African American Children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Michell, S.L. (2010). Culturally Relevant Pedagogy. In Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Exceptional Students, Grassi, E.A. (Ed.), (pp.187-197). London: SAGE Publishing.
Minamiura, R. (2013). Gaikokujin Jidoseito no tameno Shakaika-kyoiku (Social Studies Education for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students). Tokyo: AkashiShoten.
Strike, K. & Soltis, J.F. (1998). Dealing with Diversity: Multiculturalism and Religions. In The Ethics of Teaching. (pp. 70-93). NY: Teachers College Press.
Tsuji, N. (2010). Chapter one: Classroom Management. In Nihongo ga Hanasenai Otomodachi o Mukaete (Welcoming Japanese Language Learners as Friends). Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan
Nieto (1996). Affirming Diversity: The Sociopolitical Context of Education. NY: Longman.
Shimojima, Y. (2014).Teachers’ Perspectives and Case Studies of Japanese Language Lesson Plans for Chinese Newcomer Migrant Students in a Night Public High School. The Journal of Engaged Pedagogy, Vol.14, No.1, 47-56.
Oxfam (2006). Teaching Controversial Issues. Oxford: Oxfam Development Education.
Short, G. (2012).Teaching the Holocaust in the Multicultural Classroom. In Teaching Controversial Issues in the Classroom: Key Issues and Debates. Cowan, P. & Maitles, H. (Eds.). (pp130-141). London: Continuum International.
Smyth, G. (2012). Islamophobia. In Teaching Controversial Issues in the Classroom: Key Issues and Debates. Cowan, P. & Maitles, H. (Eds.). (pp-165-175). London: Continuum International.
Van Driel & Kahn (2012). Homophobia. In Teaching Controversial Issues in the Classroom: Key Issues and Debates. Cowan, P. & Maitles, H. (Eds.). (pp-176-187). London: Continuum International.
Villegas, A.M. & Lucas, T.L. (2007).The Culturally Responsive Teacher. Educational Leadership, March, Vol.64, No.6, 28-33.
An Examination of Pre-Service Primary School Teachers’ Comprehension of The Concept of Physics Through Metaphors
pp. 140-150 | Article Number: ijpe.2017.033
The aim of this study is to lay bare pre-service primary school teachers’ perception of “physics” through metaphors. The study was realized with the participation of 38 freshmen pre-service teachers taking General Physics at a public university. Data of the study were obtained with participants filling the blanks in the following sentence: “In my opinion physics is like a/an … because …” The study was designed in phenomenological method, which is one of the qualitative research methods. In the analysis of data, content analysis method was used. As a result of the obtained data, it was determined that pre-service primary school teachers constructed 31 valid metaphors in relation to the concept of physics. It was determined that the highest frequency among these metaphors belongs to the “nightmare”. Metaphors generated by the pre-service teachers were grouped under seven different conceptual categories in terms of the meanings they contain. As a result of the study, it was determined that most of the metaphors generated by the pre-service teachers consist of a negative perception.
Keywords: Pre-service primary school teachers, physics, metaphor
Altıntaş G., Kahraman E., Ülger E. & Altıntaş S. U. (2013). Science' course and 'science teachers' metaphors developed concepts of science teachers. The Fifth International Congress of Educational Research, 6 - 9 June, Çanakkale, Turkey, 799-810.
Altıntaş G., Kahraman E., Ülger E. & Altıntaş S. U. (2014). The metaphors developed bye students for the concepts in 'the particulate structure of matter' unit of science and technology course. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 3(3), 271-282.
Angell, C., Guttersrud, Ø., Henriksen, E. K.. & Isnes A. (2004). Physics: Frightful, but fun pupils’ and teachers’ views of physics and physics teaching. Science Education, 88(5), 683-706.
Arslan, M.M. & Bayrakçı, M (2006). Metaforik düşünme ve öğrenme yaklaşımının eğitim-öğretim açısından incelenmesi [An examination of metaphoric thinking and learning approach in terms of education]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 171, 100-108.
Aycan, Ş. & Yumuşak, A. (2003). Lise fizik müfredatındaki konuların anlaşılma düzeyleri üzerine bir araştırma [A study on the comprehension levels of topics in the high school physics curriculum]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 159, 171-180.
Aydın, İ.S. & Pehlivan, A. (2010) . The metaphors that turkish teacher candidates use concerning "teacher" and "student" concepts. Turkish Studies, International Periodical For The Languages, Literature And History Of Turkish Or Turkic, 5(3), 818-842.
Bahadır, E. & Özdemir, A. Ş. (2012). 7th grade prı̇mary school students mental images about the concept of mathemati̇c. International Journal of Social Science Research, 1(1), 26-40.
Baubeng, I. Conner, L. & Winter, D. (2015). The lack of physics teachers: “Like a bath with the plug out and the tap half on”. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(6), 721-730.
Baş, T. & Akturan, U. (2008). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri: Nvivo 7.0 ile nitel veri analizi. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık. [Qualitative research methods: Qualitative data analysis with Nvivo 7.0. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing House]
Cerit, Y. (2006). School metaphors: The views of students, teachers and administrators Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice , 6(3), 669-699.
Clarken, R. H. (1997). Five metaphors for educators. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Çelikten, M. (2006). Culture and teacher metaphors used in educational system . Erciyes University, Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 21(2), 269-283.
Doğan, D. (2014). Analysis of the school concept through the perspectives of candidate teachers via metaphors. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 7(3), 361-382.
Duit, R. (1991) On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649-672.
Ertaş, İ. (1993). Denel fizik dersleri. İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi [Empiric Physics Courses. Izmir: Ege University Press].
Fretzin, L. (2001). Metaphors in teaching. Retrieved 16.02.2016, from http://lrs.ed.uiuc.edu/students/fretzin/EPL11q5Metaphors.htm
Forceville, C. (2002). The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(1), 1–14.
Gill, P. (1999). The physics/maths problem again. Physics Education, 34(2), 83-87.
Goldstein, L. S. (2005). Becoming a teacher as a hero’s journey: using metaphor ın preservice teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(1), 7–24.
Hanson, L. (1993). Affective response to learning via visual metaphor. Annual Conference of the International Visual Literacy Association, October 13-17, New York.
İbret B. U. & Aydınözü D. (2011). The metaphors developed by elementary school-second stage students on the concept of ‘world’. Kastamonu Education Journal, 19(1), 85-102.
Kapucu, S. (2014). Salient beliefs of pre-service primary school teachers underlying an attitude “liking or disliking physics”. Science Education International, 25(4), 437-458.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.(2003). Metaphors we live by. London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (2005). Metaforlar: Hayat, anlam ve dil (Çeviri G. Y. Demir). İstanbul: Paradigma.
Levine, P.M. (2005). Metaphors and images of classrooms. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 41(4), 172-175.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (second press). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Morgan, G. (1980). Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solving in organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 606-622.
Nuhoğlu, H. & Yalçın, N. (2004). The development of attitude scale for physics laboratory and the assessment of pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards physics laboratory. Gazi University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty , 5(2), 317-327.
Ocak, G. & Gündüz, M. (2006). The comparison of pre-service teachers’ metaphors about the teacher-profession before and after the ‘ıntroduction to teacher-profession’ course. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(2), 293-311.
Ornek, F., Robinson, W.R. & Haugan, M.P. (2008). What makes physics diffficult? International Journal of Enviorenmental & Science Education, 3(1), 30-34.
Orton, T. & Roper, T. (2000). Science and mathematics: A relationship in need of counselling? Studies in Science Education, 35, 123–154.
Osborn, M. (1997). The play of metaphors. Education, 118(1), 84-87.
Oxford, R., Tomlinson, S., Barcelos, A., Harrington, C., Lavine, R., Saleh, A. & Longhini, A. (1998). Clashing metaphors about classroom teachers: Toward a systematic typology for the language teaching field. System, 26(1), 3-50.
Palmquist, R.A. (2001). Cognitive style and users’ metaphors for the web: an exploratory study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27(1), 24-32.
Reid, N. & Skryabina, E.A. (2002). Attitudes towards physics. Research in Science and Technological Education, 20(1), 67-81.
Redish, E. F. (1994). The implications of cognitive studies for teaching physics. American Journal of Physics, 62, 796-803.
Saban, A. (2004). Entry level prospective classroom teachers’ metaphors about the concept of “teacher”.The Tournal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 2(2), 131-155.
Saban, A. (2008). Metaphors about school. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 55, 459-496.
Saban, A. (2009). Prospectıve teachers’ mental images about the concept of student. The Tournal of Turkish Educational Sciences,, 7(2), 281-326.
Saban, A., Koçbeker, B.N., & Saban, A. (2006). An investigation of the concept of the teacher among prospective teachers through metaphor analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 6(2), 509-522.
Sadoğlu, G. P. & Uzun, S. (2014). Identifying pre-service science and technology teachers’ perceptions related to the concept of physics through metaphors. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 5(1), 36-41.
Sarı, M. (2013). The effect of experimental teaching of physics topics in the study of student success and challenges of teachers. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 2(3), 143-147.
Sanchez, A., Barreiro J. M. & Maojo V. (2000). Desing of virtual reality systems for education: A cognitive approach. Education and Information Technologies, 5(4), 354-362.
Semerci, Ç. (2007). A view to the new primary school curricula with the metaphors relating to “curriculum development. Cumhuriyet University The Journal of Social Sciences, 31(1), 139-154.
Serway, R. A. (1995). Physics for scientists & engineers wiht modern physics. Third edition. Translation Editor, Kemal Çolakoğlu, Palme Publishing House.
Soysal, D. & Afacan, Ö. (2012). Metaphors used by primary school students to describe “science and technology lesson” and “science and technology teacher”. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 9(19), 287-306.
Şahin, B. (2013). Teacher candidates’ metapforic perceptions related with “mathematics teacher”, “mathematics”and “math lesson” concepts. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(1), 313-321.
Şahin, E., & Yağbasan, R. (2012). Determining which introductory physics topics pre - service physics teachers have difficulty understanding and what accounts for these difficulties. European Journal of Physics , 33, 315-325.
Şengül, S., Katrancı, Y. & Cantimer, G.G. (2014). Metaphor perceptions of secondary school students about “mathematics teacher”. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 25(1), 89-111.
Tekbıyık, A. & Akdeniz, A.R. (2010). A contemporary physics attitude scale for secondary school students: development, validity and reliability. Journal Turkish Science Education , 7(4), 134-144.
Usta, N. D. & Ültay, N. (2015). A comparative study of preschool student teachers'“chemistry” metaphors. The Black Sea Journal of Social Sciences, Special Issue of Hüseyin Hüsnü Tekışık, 1(7), 163-177.
Vadeboncoeur, J. A., & Torres, M. N. (2003). Constructing and reconstructing teaching roles: A focus on generative metaphors and dichotomies. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 24(1), 87-103.
Whitelegg, E. & Parry, M. (1999). Real-life contexts for learning physics: meanings, issues and practice. Physics Education, 34, 68-72.
Yalmancı, S. G. & Aydın, S. (2013). Pre-service teachers’ metaphorical perceptions towards biology. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 10(21), 208-223.
Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (9. Baskı) Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.[Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences (9th edition). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publishing]
Yob, I. M. (2003). Thinking constructively with metaphors. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 22(2), 127-138.
Yücel A. S., Koçak C. & Cula S. (2010) An analysis on proactive-reactive personality profiles in student-teacher relationship through the metaphorical thinking approach. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6(2), 131-139.