PEN Academic Publishing   |  ISSN: 1554-5210

International Journal of Progressive Education 2016, Vol. 12(2) 149-165

ICT Integration of Turkish Teachers: An Analysis within TPACK-Practical Model

Yusuf AY, Engin KARADAĞ & M. Bahaddin ACAT

pp. 149 - 165   |  Manu. Number: ijpe.2016.012

Published online: June 01, 2016  |   Number of Views: 305  |  Number of Download: 227


Abstract

The aim of the study is to analyze Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) integration of Turkish teachers using various variables within the context of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). These variables were indicated as the gender of teachers, the implementation status of FATIH project at their schools, school types that the teachers were commissioned at, and their years of seniority. The study was conducted using causal-comparative design, one of the non-empirical quantitative research methods. TPACK-Practical Scale was utilized as data collection tool in the study. The data were collected from 296 teachers serving at Ministry of Education state schools. The analysis of the data was conducted using descriptive statistics, independent samples t-test, and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Findings of the study demonstrated that teachers scored the highest mean points in Curriculum Design, while the mean scores for Infusing ICT to assess students was the lowest. Furthermore, while there was no significant difference between the total mean scores of females and males, a significant difference was observed between the teachers that serve at schools where FATIH project was implemented and the teachers that serve at schools where FATIH project was not implemented, and between the teachers that serve in different types of schools.

Keywords: Technology integration, ICT, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge, teacher efficiencies, FATIH Project


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
AY, Y., KARADAG, E. & ACAT, M.B. (2016). ICT Integration of Turkish Teachers: An Analysis within TPACK-Practical Model. International Journal of Progressive Education, 12(2), 149-165.

Harvard
AY, Y., KARADAG, E. and ACAT, M. (2016). ICT Integration of Turkish Teachers: An Analysis within TPACK-Practical Model. International Journal of Progressive Education, 12(2), pp. 149-165.

Chicago 16th edition
AY, Yusuf, Engin KARADAG and M. Bahaddin ACAT (2016). "ICT Integration of Turkish Teachers: An Analysis within TPACK-Practical Model". International Journal of Progressive Education 12 (2):149-165.

References
  • Abbitt, J. (2011). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teacher education: A review of current methods and instruments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43 (4), 281–300.
  • Adıgüzel, A. (2010). İlköğretim okullarında öğretim teknolojilerinin durumu ve sınıf öğretmenlerinin bu teknolojileri kullanma düzeyleri. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15, 1-17.
  • Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 21(4), 154-168.
  • Archambault, L. M., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55 (4), 1656–1662. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009
  • Ay, Y., Karadağ, E., & Acat, M. B. (2015). The technological pedagogical content knowledge-practical (TPACK-practical) model: examination of its validity in the Turkish culture via structural equation modeling. Computers & Education, 88, 97-108.
  • Baylor, A., Shen, E. & Huang, X. (2003). Which pedagogical agent do learners choose? The effects of gender and ethnicity. In A. Rossett (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2003, (1507-1510). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  • Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Educational research methodology. Athens: Metaixmio.
  • Cox, S., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Diagramming TPCK in Practice: Using and elaborated model of the TPCK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrends, 53 (5), 60-69.
  • Çoklar A.N., Kılıçer, K. & Odabaşı, H.F. (2007, Mayıs). Eğitimde teknoloji kullanımına eleştirel bir bakış: Teknopedagoji, 7. Uluslararası Eğitim Teknolojileri Konferansı, Lefkoşe, KKTC.
  • Çuhadar, C., Bülbül, T., & Ilgaz, G. (2013). Exploring of the relationship between ındividual ınnovativeness and techno-pedagogical education competencies of pre-service teachers. Elementary Education Online, 12 (3), 797‐807.
  • Doering , A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009). Using the technological, pedagogical and content knowledge framework to design online learning environments and professional development. Journal of Education Computing Research, 41 (3), 319-346
  • Einarsson, C., & Granström, K. (2002). Gender-biased interaction in the classroom: the influence of gender and age in the relationship between teacher and pupil. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 117 – 127.
  • Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57,1953-1960.
  • Gürol, M., Donmuş, V. & Arslan, M. (2012). İlköğretim kademesinde görev yapan sınıf öğretmenlerinin fatih projesi ile ilgili görüşleri. Eğitim Teknolojileri Araştırmaları Dergisi. 3(3). http://www.et-ad.net/dergi/index.php?journal=etad.
  • Harris, J.B., & Hofer, M.J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of middle school teachers' curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43 (3), 211-229.
  • Hopf, D. & Hatzichristou, C. (1999).Teacher gender-related influences in Greek schools.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 1-18.
  • Işıksal, M., & Aşkar, P. (2003). İlköğretim öğrencileri için matematik ve bilgisayar özyeterlik algısı ölçekleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25, 109–117.
  • Jamieson, R. Finger, G., & Albion, P. (2010). Auditng the TK and TPACK confidence of pre-service teachers: Are they ready fort he proffession? Australian Educational Computing, 25 (1), 8-17. Jang, S. J. (2010). Integrating the interactive whiteboard and peer coaching to develop the TPACK of middle science teachers. Computers & Education, 55 (4), 1744–1751.
  • Jen, T. H., Yeh, Y. F., Hsu, Y. S., Wu, H. K., & Chen, K. M. (2016). Science teachers' TPACK-Practical: Standard-setting using an evidence-based approach. Computers & Education, 95, 45-62.
  • Kabakcı Yurdakul, I., Odabaşı, H. F., Kilicer, K., Coklar, A. N., Birinci, G., & Kurt, A. A. (2012). The development, validity and reliability of TPACK-deep: A technological pedagogical content knowledge scale. Computers & Education, 58(3), 964-977. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.012
  • Karakaya, (2013). FATİH projesi kapsamında pilot okul olarak belirlenen ortaöğretim kurumlarında çalışan kimya öğretmenlerinin teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi yeterlikleri, (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Ankara.
  • Kocaoğlu, B. Ü. (2013). Lise öğretmenlerinin fatih projesi teknolojilerini kullanmaya yönelik özyeterlik inançları: Kayseri ili örneği. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Sakarya Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Sakarya.
  • Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
  • Koh, J. L., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Examining practicing teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) pathways: A structural equation modeling approach. Instr Sci, 41, 793–809.
  • Koppi, T., Sheard, J., Naghdy, F., Edwards, S. L., & Brookes, W. (2010). Towards a gender inclusive information and communications technology curriculum: a perspective from graduates in the workforce. Computer Science Education, 20 (4), 265-282.
  • Kurt, A. A., Kuzu, A., Dursun, Ö.Ö., Güllüpınar, F. & Gültekin, M. (2013). FATİH projesinin pilot uygulama sürecinin değerlendirilmesi: Öğretmen görüşleri, Journal of Instructional Technologies &Teacher Education. 1 (2), 1-23.
  • Lasen, M. (2010). Education and career pathways in Information Communication Technology: What are schoolgirls saying? Computers & Education, 54(4), 1117-1126.
  • Lee, C. J., & Kim, C. (2014). An implementation study of a TPACK-based instructional design model in a technology integration course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(4), 437-460.
  • Lee, M., & Tsai, C. (2010). Exploring teachers' perceived self efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the world wide web. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 38 (1), 1-21.
  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017 -1054.
  • Morgil, İ., Seçken, N., & Yücel, S. (2004). Kimya öğretmen adaylarının özyeterlik inançlarının bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6 (1), 212-234.
  • Mudasiru, O. Y. (2005). An investigation into teacher’s self-efficacy in implementing computer education in Nigerian middle schools, Meridian: A Middle School Technologies Journal, 8 (2), 1-5.
  • Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509-523.
  • Shantz, D. (1995), Teacher education: Teaching innovation or providing an apprenticeship?. Education, 115 (3), 393-343.
  • Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52 (2), 302-312.
  • Timur, B. (2011). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının kuvvet ve hareket konusundaki teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgilerinin gelişimi. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi), Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimler Enstitüsü: Ankara.
  • Torkzadeh, G., &Van Dyke. T. P. (2002). Effects of training on internet self-efficacy and computer user attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 18 (5), 479- 494.
  • Usluel, Y. K., & Mazman, S. G. (2010). Eğitimde yeniliklerin yayılımı, kabulü ve benimsenmesi sürecinde yer alan öğeler: Bir içerik analizi çalışması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3 (39), 60-74.
  • Yeh, Y., Hsu, Y., Wu, H., Hwang, F., & Lin, T. (2013). Developing and validating technological pedagogical content knowledge‐practical (TPACK‐practical) through the Delphi survey technique. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 1-16.
  • Yörük, T. (2013). Genel lise yöneticileri, öğretmenleri ve öğrencilerinin teknolojiye karşi tutumlari ve eğitimde FATIH projesinin kullanimina ilişkin görüşleri üzerine bir araştirma. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Antalya.