PEN Academic Publishing   |  ISSN: 1554-5210

International Journal of Progressive Education 2018, Vol. 14(1) 56-74

A Critical View on Teacher Guidebooks as an Agent in Teacher Deskilling Process

Mediha Sarı

pp. 56 - 74   |  DOI:   |  Manu. Number: .R1

Published online: February 11, 2018  |   Number of Views: 106  |  Number of Download: 161


The purpose of this study is to identify the views of teachers on teacher guidebooks and to analyse these views on the basis of the deskilling process. The data were collected from 67 teachers through an open-ended questionnaire, and analysed using content analysis method. Results showed that although most of the teachers considered the guidebooks necessary, they also made a number of criticisms. Among these, there were criticisms indicating that the guidebooks hindered teacher autonomy in various ways. Teachers' views and criticisms in this direction confirm that guidebooks have an important role in the deskilling process of teachers.

Keywords: Deskilling process; guidebooks; technician teacher; control; professionalism

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Sari, M. (2018). A Critical View on Teacher Guidebooks as an Agent in Teacher Deskilling Process. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(1), 56-74. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2018.129.5

Sari, M. (2018). A Critical View on Teacher Guidebooks as an Agent in Teacher Deskilling Process. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(1), pp. 56-74.

Chicago 16th edition
Sari, Mediha (2018). "A Critical View on Teacher Guidebooks as an Agent in Teacher Deskilling Process". International Journal of Progressive Education 14 (1):56-74. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2018.129.5.

  1. Acker, S. (1999). The realities of teachers' work: Never a dull moment. London: Redwood Books Ltd.
  2. Apple, M. W. (2016). Challenging the epistemologic fog: The roles of the scholar/activist in education. European Educational Research Journal, 15(5), 505–515.
  3. Apple, M. W., (1988). Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education. NewYork: Routledge. 
  4. Apple, M. W., & Teitelbaum, K. (1986). Are teachers losing control of their skills and curriculum? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18(2), 177-184.
  5. Ayvacı, H. Ş. & Er-Nas, S. (2009). Evaluation of teacher guidebooks based on teachers’ views under constructivism learning theory. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 212-225. 
  6. Ballet, K., & Kelchtermans, G. (2009). Struggling with workload: Primary teachers’ experience of intensification. Teaching and Teacher Education 25, 1150–1157. 
  7. Ballet, K., Kelchtermans, G., & Loughran, J. (2006). Beyond intensification towards a scholarship of practice: Analysing changes in teachers' work lives. Teachers and Teaching, 12(2), 209-229. 
  8. Connell, R. (2009). Good teachers on dangerous ground: Towards a new view of teacher quality and professionalism. Critical Studies in Education, 50(3), 213-229. 
  9. Demirkasımoğlu, N. (2010). Defining Teacher Professionalism from different perspectives. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 2047–2051. 
  10. Easthope, C., & Easthope, G. (2000). Intensification, extension and complexity of teachers' workload. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(1), 43-58,
  11. Eryaman, M. Y., & Riedler, M. (2010). Teacher-Proof Curriculum. In C. Kridel (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Curriculum Studies. Sage Publications.
  12. Genç, S. Z., Güner, F., & Güner, A. S. (2014). Examining the primary school teachers’ views related to teacher guidebooks (sample of Çanakkale Province). Dicle University, Journal of Ziya Gökalp faculty of Education, 23, 79-109. 
  13. Giroux, H. A. (2011). Zombie politics and culture in the age of casino capitalism. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc. 
  14. Goodman, J. (1988). The disenfranchisement of elementary teachers and strategies for resistance. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 3(3), 201-220.
  15. Göçer, A. (2011). The statement of functionality of secondary education Turkish teacher guidebooks. The Journal of International Social Research, 4(16), 154-164. 
  16. Göçer, A., & Aktürk, Y. (2015). Perceptions of primary and secondary school teachers on teacher’s guidebooks: A metaphor analysis. İnternationl Journal of Turkish Education Sciences, 4, 186-199. 
  17. Gür, B., S. (2014). Deskilling of teachers: The case of Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(3), 887-904. 
  18. Hargreaves, A. (1992). Time and teachers' work: An analysis of the intensification thesis. Teachers College Record, 94(1), 87-108.
  19. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age. London: Redwood Books 
  20. Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society. New York: Teachers College
  21. Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., Moore, S., & Manning, S. (2001). Learning to change: Teaching beyond subjects and standards.  San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
  22. Kırmızı, B. (2013). The significance of the teachers’ guidebooks in German language teaching. International Journal of Social Science, 6(3), 1217-1230. 
  23. Kulantaş, N. (2007). The evaluation of the students textbooks and workbooks and teachers guidebooks used in social studies lessons of the 4 th and 5 th grades accordance with the views of the teachers, students and the parents. Ph.D. dissertation, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
  24. Ministry of National Education [MONE] (2012). Textbooks and training tools regulation. Retrieved from 
  25. Ministry of National Education [MONE] (2017). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved from
  26. Milner, H. R. (2013). Policy reforms and de-professionalization of teaching. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from
  27. Özsoy, S., & Ünal, L.I. (2010). Educational sciences and teacher training in Turkey: A story of a crossroad. Education, Science Society, 3(11), 78-101.
  28. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. USA: Sage Publications
  29. Reid, A. (2003). Understanding teachers’ work: Is there still a place for labour process theory? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(5), 559-573.
  30. Seddon, T. (1997). Education: Deprofessionalized? Or reregulated, reorganized and reauthorized? Australian Journal of Education, 41(3), 228-246.
  31. Sleeter, C. (2008). Equity, democracy, and neoliberal assaults on teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 1947-1957.
  32. Smyth, J., Dow, A., Hattam, R., Reid, A., & Shacklock, G. (2000). Teachers’ work in a globalizing economy. London and New York: Roudledge-Falmer Press. 
  33. Taneri, P. O., Akgündüz, M. M., & Nayir K. F. (2014). The teachers against the education reforms under the influence of neoliberalism. European Journal of Research on Social Sciences, 1(2), 1-7.
  34. Ünal, L. I. (2005). Neoliberal transformation in teacher image. Education, Science Society, 3(11), 4-15. 
  35. Walsh, S. C., Brigham, S. M., & Wang, Y. (2011). Internationally educated female teachers in the neoliberal context: Their labour market and teacher certification experiences in Canada. Teaching and Teacher Education 27, 657-665
  36. Wong, J., L., N. (2006) Control and professional development: are teachers being deskilled or reskilled within the context of decentralization? Educational Studies, 32(1), 17-37.
  37. Yaman, T., & Demir S., B. (2015). An Assessment of the uses of teacher’s social studies guidebooks. Journal of Subject Teaching Research, 1(1), 23-32. 
  38. Yıldız, A. (2014). Transformation of teaching profession in Turkey:  From Idealist teacher to technician teacher. In A. Yıldız, (Ed.), Transformation of teaching, (p.13-26). İstanbul: Kalkedon
  39. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek H. (2016). Qualitative research methods for social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.