PEN Academic Publishing   |  ISSN: 1554-5210

International Journal of Progressive Education 2018, Vol. 14(1) 105-121

‘We are a Chinese school’: Constructing school identity from the lived experiences of expatriate and Chinese teaching faculty in a Type C international school in Shanghai, China.

Adam Poole

pp. 105 - 121   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2018.129.8

Published online: February 11, 2018  |   Number of Views: 132  |  Number of Download: 113


Abstract

This study explores school identity by analysing the perceptions of Chinese and expatriate teachers in a Type C, non-traditional international school in Shanghai, China. The purpose of this study was to build on Hayden’s (2016) work by offering a detailed description of this type of school which continues to be under researched. A mixed-methods approach was adopted that explored the school’s identity on three levels: the rhetorical, the curricula, and the lived. The data revealed considerable discontinuity between these levels, particularly from the perspective of the international teachers. The findings are discussed in relation to cultural scripts for teaching and learning and institutional logics and implications are drawn for creating a more interculturally inclusive school ethos.

Keywords: school identity, mixed methods, curricula, international schools


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Poole, A. (2018). ‘We are a Chinese school’: Constructing school identity from the lived experiences of expatriate and Chinese teaching faculty in a Type C international school in Shanghai, China.. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(1), 105-121. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2018.129.8

Harvard
Poole, A. (2018). ‘We are a Chinese school’: Constructing school identity from the lived experiences of expatriate and Chinese teaching faculty in a Type C international school in Shanghai, China.. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(1), pp. 105-121.

Chicago 16th edition
Poole, Adam (2018). "‘We are a Chinese school’: Constructing school identity from the lived experiences of expatriate and Chinese teaching faculty in a Type C international school in Shanghai, China.". International Journal of Progressive Education 14 (1):105-121. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2018.129.8.

References
  1. Ball, S. J. (2010). The necessity and violence of theory. In Thomson, P., & Walker, M. (Eds.). The Routledge Doctoral Student's Companion: Getting to grips with research in education and the social sciences. Routledge, 68-75. 
  2. Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). 2 how actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The academy of management annals, 3(1), 65-107.
  3. Bjerregaard, T., & Jonasson, C. (2014). Managing unstable institutional contradictions: The work of becoming. Organization Studies, 35(10), 1507-1536.
  4. Bourdieu, P., Chamboredon, J. C., & Passeron, J. C. (1991). The craft of sociology: Epistemological preliminaries. Walter de Gruyter.
  5. Bunnell, T., Fertig, M., & James, C. (2016). What is international about International Schools? An institutional legitimacy perspective. Oxford Review of Education.
  6. Bunnell, T., & Fertig, M. (2016). International schools as' institutions' and the issue of 'legitimacy'. International Schools Journal, 36(1), 56-64.
  7. Chen, Y., & Reid, I. (2002). Citizenship education in Chinese schools: retrospect and prospect. Research in Education, 67(1), 58-69.
  8. Chen, Q., May, L., Klenowski, V., & Kettle, M. (2014). The enactment of formative assessment in English language classrooms in two Chinese universities: Teacher and student responses. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21, 271–285.
  9. Cheng, K. M. (2010). Shanghai and Hong Kong: Two distinct examples of education reform in China. In OAED (Ed.), Organisation for economic co-operation and development, strong performers and successful performers in education: Lessons from P ISA for the United States (pp. 83–115). Paris: OAED.
  10. Chow, A. (2014). Replanting the flower in different soil? A critical analysis of education borrowing in Hong Kong. International Journal of Education, 6, p114–p130.
  11. Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive interactionism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage ECNUAS. (2015). School Brochure. [Brochure]. Shanghai: Auht.
  12. Fairbrother, G. P. (2003). Toward critical patriotism. Hong Kong University Press, HKU.
  13. Gellar, C. (2002). International education: A commitment to universal values. In M. Hayden, J. Thomspon, & G. Walker (eds), International Education in Practice: Dimensions for Schools and International Schools (pp. 30-35). Abingdon: Routledge.
  14. Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317-371.
  15. Gu, P. Y. (2014). The unbearable lightness of the curriculum: What drives the assessment practices of a teacher of English as a foreign language in a Chinese secondary school? Assessment in Education: Principles Policy & Practice, 21, 286–305.
  16. Gu, Q., & Schweisfurth, M. (2015). Transnational connections, competences and identities: experiences of Chinese international students after their return ‘home’. British Educational Research Journal, 41(6), 947-970.
  17. Gu, Q. (2014). The Work and Lives of Teachers in China. Oxford: Routledge.
  18. Hayden, M. (2006). Introduction to International education: International schools and their communities. London: Sage. 
  19. Hayden, M. (2011). Transnational spaces of education: the growth of the international school sector. Globalisation, societies and education, 9(2), 211-224.
  20. Hayden, M. (2016). Institutional Interpretations of International Education in National Contexts. In: SAGE Library of Educational Thought and Practice: International Education (Volume 2):. London: Sage, i-xiv
  21. Hayden, M. & Thompson J. (2013). International Schools: Antecedents, current issues and metaphors for the future, in P Pearce (Ed), International Education and Schools: Moving Beyond the First 40 years (pp. 3 – 23). London: Bloomsbury. 
  22. Hwang, A., Ang, S., & Francesco, A. M. (2002). The silent Chinese: The influence of face and Kiasuism on Student Feedback-Seeking Behaviors. Journal of Management Education, 26, 70–98.
  23. ISC (2015) ISC The International School Consultancy. Faringdon: The International School Consultancy. 
  24. Ivankova, N., Creswell, J., & Stick, S. (2006). Using mixed methods in sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(3), 3-20.
  25. Jin, L., & Cortazzi, M. (2006). Changing practices in Chinese Cultures of Learning. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 19, 5–20.
  26. Johnson, B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2006). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
  27. Kuhn, T. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1962)
  28. Lan, P.-C. (2014). Segmented incorporation: The second generation of rural migrants in Shanghai. The China Quarterly, 217, 243–265.
  29. Law, W. (2014). Understanding china’s curriculum reform for the 21st century. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46, 332–360
  30. Lowe, J.A. (2000). International examinations: The new credentialism and reproduction of  advantage in a globalising world. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice. 7(3), 363-377.
  31. Mair, J., Mayer, J., & Lutz, E. (2015). Navigating institutional plurality: Organizational governance in hybrid organizations. Organization Studies, 36(6), 713-739.
  32. Marshall, H. 2007. The global education terminology debate: Exploring some of the issues. In The Sage handbook of research in international education, ed. M.C. Hayden, J. Levy, and J.J. Thompson, 38-50. London: Sage.
  33. Matthews, M. (1989) The scale of international education’, International Schools Journal, 17:7-17. 
  34. Ministry of Education (2010). Outline of China’s National Plan for Medium–and long-term Education Reform and reform Development, 2010–2020. [accessed 19/12/2016] http://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/upload/China/China_National_Long_Term_Educational_Reform_Development_2010-2020_eng.pdf
  35. Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(1), 48-76.
  36. Nanzhao, Z., Muju, Z., Baohua, Y., Xia, G., Wenjing, W., & Li, Z. (2007). Educational reform and curriculum change in China: a comparative case study. International Bureau of education. [accessed 20/12/216] http://www.ibe.unesco.org/fileadmin/user_upload/COPs/Pages_documents/Comparative_Research/EduReformChina.pdf
  37. Pearce R. (2013). International Education and Schools: Moving Beyond the First 40 Years. Bloomsbury Academic: London 
  38. Poole, A. (2016). ‘Complex teaching realities’ and ‘deep rooted cultural traditions’: Barriers to the implementation and internalization of formative assessment in China. Cogent Education, 3: 1156242.
  39. Robinson, J., & Guan, X. (2012). The changing face of international education in China. On the Horizon, 20(4), 305-312.
  40. Ryan, J. (Ed.). (2013). Education reform in China: Changing concepts, contexts and practices (Vol. 69). Routledge. 
  41. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students (4th ed.). Essex: Person Education Limited.
  42. Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). Looking East: Shanghai, PISA 2009 and the reconstitution of reference societies in the global education policy field. Comparative Education, 49, 464–485.
  43. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1998). Teaching is a cultural activity. American Educator, 22, 4–11.
  44. Sung, C. C. M. (2014). Global, local or glocal? Identities of L2 learners in English as a Lingua Franca communication. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 27(1), 43-57.
  45. Tan, C. (2013). Learning from Shanghai: Lessons in success (Vol. 21). Singapore: Springer Science & Business Media.
  46. Tan, C. (2015a). Education policy borrowing and cultural scripts for teaching in China. Comparative Education, 51, 196–211.
  47. Tan, C., & Chua, C. (2015). Education policy borrowing in China: Has the West wind overpowered the East wind? Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45, 686–704.
  48. Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990 1. American journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801-843.
  49. Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 840, 99-128.
  50. Walker, G. (2016). International Schools and International Curricula. In M. Hayden, Mary, and J. Thompson (Eds). International Schools: Current Issues and Future Prospects. (pp. 37-51). Oxford: Symposium Books Ltd 
  51. Wu, Q. (2015). Re-examining the “Chinese learner”: a case study of mainland Chinese students’ learning experiences at British Universities. Higher Education, 70(4), 753-766.
  52. Yan, C. (2012). ‘We can only change in a small way’: A study of secondary English teachers’ implementation of curriculum reform in China. Journal of Educational Change, 13, 431–447.
  53. Yang, D. T. (2015). The Pursuit of the Chinese Dream in America: Chinese Undergraduate Students at American Universities. Rowman & Littlefield.
  54. Yin, X., & Buck, G. A. (2015). There is another choice: an exploration of integrating formative assessment in a Chinese high school chemistry classroom through collaborative action research. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10, 753–762.
  55. Yu, K. H. (2013). Institutionalization in the context of institutional pluralism: Politics as a generative process. Organization Studies, 34(1), 105-131.