PEN Academic Publishing   |  ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2018, Vol. 14(2) 77-92

Effects of Formative Assessment on Prospective Teachers’  Achievement, Attitude and Self-Regulation Skills

Remzi Y. Kıncal & Ceyhun Ozan

pp. 77 - 92   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2018.139.6   |  Manu. Number: .R1

Published online: April 25, 2018  |   Number of Views: 171  |  Number of Download: 211


Abstract

The aim of the study is to investigate the effects of formative assessment on prospective teachers’ academic achievement, attitudes towards educational measurement and self-regulation skills. In the study, quasi-experimental design including non-equivalent pre-test and post-test control group. There are 40 prospective teachers in each one of the experimental and control group which implemented in the scope of measurement and evaluation course in education faculty. Formative assessment was implemented within the 14-weeks in the experimental group, and summative assessment practices were done in the control group. According to the research results, it is determined that academic achievements of prospective teachers in the experimental group have differentiated significantly to academic achievements of prospective achievement in the control group. There is no statistically significant difference between prospective students’ attitudes towards measurement and self-regulation in the experimental and control group. However, it has been made out those prospective teachers’ attitudes towards measurement and self-regulation skills in the experimental group have been higher than the others’ in the control group.

Keywords: formative assessment, academic achievement, attitudes towards measurement, self-regulation skills, prospective teachers


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Kincal, R.Y. & Ozan, C. (2018). Effects of Formative Assessment on Prospective Teachers’  Achievement, Attitude and Self-Regulation Skills. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(2), 77-92. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2018.139.6

Harvard
Kincal, R. and Ozan, C. (2018). Effects of Formative Assessment on Prospective Teachers’  Achievement, Attitude and Self-Regulation Skills. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(2), pp. 77-92.

Chicago 16th edition
Kincal, Remzi Y. and Ceyhun Ozan (2018). "Effects of Formative Assessment on Prospective Teachers’  Achievement, Attitude and Self-Regulation Skills". International Journal of Progressive Education 14 (2):77-92. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2018.139.6.

References
  1. Altman, J. R., Lazarus, S. S., Quenemoen, R. F., Kearns, J., Quenemoen, M., & Thurlow, M. L. (2010). 2009 survey of states: Accomplishments and new issues at the end of a decade of change. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. [Google Scholar]
  2. Altun, S., & Erden, M. (2006). Öğrenmede motive edici stratejiler ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Yeditepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2, 11-16. [Google Scholar]
  3. Andrews, T. L. (2011). The use of goal setting and progress self-monitoring with formative assessment in community college to increase academic achievement and self-efficacy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Available from ProOuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3440057) [Google Scholar]
  4. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar]
  5. Asghar, M. (2012). The lived experience of formative assessment practice in a British university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 36(2), 205-223. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2011.606901 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  6. Aydeniz, M., & Pabuccu, A. (2011). Understanding the impact of formative assessment strategies on first year university students` conceptual understanding of chemical concepts. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 5(2), 18-41. [Google Scholar]
  7. Azúa, X., & Bick, M. (2009) ‘Formación de profesores en evaluación para el aprendizaje’ [Teacher education on assessment for learning]. In C. Sotomayor & H. Walker (Eds.), Formación continua de profesores (pp. 263-283). Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universitaria.  [Google Scholar]
  8. Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5-25. [Google Scholar]
  9. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar]
  10. Black, P., & McCormick, R. (2010). Reflections and new directions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 493-499. doi:10.1080/02602938.2010.493696 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  11. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74. [Google Scholar]
  12. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148. [Google Scholar]
  13. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5-31. doi:10.1007/ s11092-008-9068-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  14. Bloxham, S., & Carver, M. (2014) Assessment for learning in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 123-126. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.797652 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  15. Bose, J., & Rengel, Z. (2009). A model formative assessment strategy to promote student-centered self-regulated learning in higher education. US-China Education Review, 6(12), 29-35. [Google Scholar]
  16. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Introduction: Assessment for the longer term. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 3-14). London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  17. Brown, S. (2007). Feedback and feed-forward. The Higher Education Academy Centre for Bioscience Bulletin, No: 22. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bryant, N. C., & Barnes, L. L. B. (1997). Development and validation of the attitude toward educational measurement inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 870-875. [Google Scholar]
  19. Burns, M. K., Klingbeil, D. A., & Ysseldyke, J. (2010). The effects of technology-based formative evaluation on student performance on state accountability math tests. Psychology in the Schools, 47(6), 582-591. doi:10.1002/pits.20492 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  20. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI). (2008). Assessment for learning formative assessment. Paris: OECD Publishing.  [Google Scholar]
  21. Chappuis, J., Stiggins, R., Chappuis, S., & Arter, J., (2011). Classroom assessment for student learning: Doing it right-using it well (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chauncey, P. D. (2009). Perceptions and attitudes of formative assessments in middle-school science classes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from adsabs.harvard.edu [Google Scholar]
  23. Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 205-249. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  24. Clark, K. P. (2013). The effects of formative assessment instructional practices on student academic growth and achievement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Available from ProOuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3562119) [Google Scholar]
  25. Collins, N. M. (2012). The impact of assessment for learning: Benefits and barriers to student achievement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Available from ProOuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3517764) [Google Scholar]
  26. DeLuca, C., Klinger, D., Pyper, J., & Woods, J. (2015). Instructional Rounds as a professional learning model for systemic implementation of Assessment for Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 122-139. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2014.967168 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  27. Dirksen D. (2011). Hitting the reset button. Phi Delta Kappan 92(7), 26-31.  [Google Scholar]
  28. Dixson, D. D., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. Theory Into Practice, 55(2), 153-159. doi:10.1080/ 00405841.2016.1148989 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  29. Eshun, I., Bordoh, A., Bassaw, T. K., & Mensah, M. F. (2014). Evaluation of social studies students’ learning using formative assessment in selected colleges of education in Ghana. British Journal of Education, 2(1), 39-48. [Google Scholar]
  30. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  31. Florez, T., & Sammons, P. (2013). A literature review of assessment for learning: Effects and impact. Oxford: University of Oxford, Department of Education and CfBT. [Google Scholar]
  32. Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53(3), 199-208. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gardner, J. (2012). Assessment for learning: A compelling conceptualization. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (2nd ed.) (pp. 197-204). London: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hannah, J., James, A., & Williams, P. (2014). Does computer-aided formative assessment improve learning outcomes? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(2), 269-281. doi:10.1080/ 0020739X.2013.822583 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  35. Harlen, W. (2003). Enhancing inquiry through formative assessment. San Francisco: Exploratorium. [Google Scholar]
  36. Heitink, M. C., Van der Kleij, F. M., Veldkamp, B. P., Schildkamp, K., & Kippers, W. B. (2016). A systematic review of prerequisites for implementing assessment for learning in classroom practice. Educational Research Review, 17, 50-62. [Google Scholar]
  37. Heritage, M. (2007). Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do? Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2), 140-145. [Google Scholar]
  38. Heritage, M. (2008). Learning progressions: Supporting instruction and formative assessment. Washington, DC: Chief Council of State School Officers.  [Google Scholar]
  39. Herman, J., Osmundson, E., & Silver, D. (2010). Capturing quality in formative assessment practice: Measurement challenges (CRESST Report No. 770). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). [Google Scholar]
  40. Hodgson, C., & Pyle, K. (2010). A literature review of assessment for learning in science. Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, H.-F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56, 1023-1031. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  42. James, M., McCormick, R., Black, P., Carmichael, P., Drummond, M. J., Fox, A. …, Wiliam, D. (2007). Improving learning how to learn: Classrooms, schools and networks (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  43. Johnson, A. (2016). The implementation and evaluation of formative feedback on students’ attitudes and perceptions on their learning: An action research (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Available from ProOuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 10006523) [Google Scholar]
  44. Kellaghan, T. (2004). Assessing student learning in Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank. [Google Scholar]
  45. King, M. D. (2003). The effects of formative assessment on student self-regulation, motivational beliefs, and achievement in elementary science (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Available from ProOuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3079342) [Google Scholar]
  46. Kingston, N., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), 28-37. doi:10.1111/ j.1745-3992.2011.00220.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  47. Kline, A. J. (2013). Effects of formative assessment on middle school student achievement in mathematics and reading (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Available from ProOuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 1538121) [Google Scholar]
  48. Lee, I., & Coniam, D. (2013). Introducing assessment for learning for EFL writing in an assessment of learning examination-driven system in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 34-50. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.11.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  49. Lorente-Catalan, E. (2016). Student teachers’ understanding and application of assessment for learning during a physical education teacher education course. European Physical Education Review, 22(1), 65-81. doi:10.1177/ 1356336X15590352 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  50. Maier, U., Wolf, N., & Randler, C. (2016). Effects of a computer-assisted formative assessment intervention based on multiple-tier diagnostic items and different feedback types. Computers & Education, 95, 85-98. doi:10.1016/ j.compedu.2015.12.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  51. McKenna, E. S. (2011). Student use of formatıve assessments and progress charts of formative assessments in the 7th grade science class (Unpublished master`s thesis). Retrieved from scholarworks.montana.edu [Google Scholar]
  52. McMillan, J. H. (2014). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective standards-based ınstruction (5th ed.). Essex: Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  53. Miesels, S. J, Atkins-Burnett, S., Xue, Y., Nicholson, J., Bickel, D. D., & Son, S. (2003). Creating a system of accountability: The impact of instructional assessment on elementary children’s achievement test scores. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(9), 1-18. [Google Scholar]
  54. Moeed, A. (2015). Theorizing formative assessment: Time for a change in thinking. The Educational Forum, 79, 180-189. doi:10.1080/00131725.2014.1002593 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  55. Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Barrett, K. C. (2013). IBM SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation (5th ed.). New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  56. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. [Google Scholar]
  57. O’Connor, K. (2002). How to grade for learning. Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight.  [Google Scholar]
  58. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Paris: OECD. [Google Scholar]
  59. Ozan, C., & Köse, E. (2013). Adaptation of attitudes toward educational measurement inventory (ATEMI) to Turkish. e-International Journal of Educational Research, 4(2), 29-47. [Google Scholar]
  60. Ökten, A. (2009). Effects of formative assessment application on students’ language proficiency and beliefs in language learning in E.F.L context: A case study. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  61. Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (5th ed.). Maidenhead: Open University. [Google Scholar]
  62. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  63. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Michigan: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, ERIC database number: ED338122. [Google Scholar]
  64. Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom (Vol. XVII). New York: Agathon Press. [Google Scholar]
  65. Popham, J. (2013). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. [Google Scholar]
  66. Robson, C. (2011). Real world research (3th ed.). West Sussex, England: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  67. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57-84. doi:10.1002/tea.20163 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  68. Rushton, A. (2005). Formative assessment: A key to deeper learning? Medical Teacher, 27(6), 509-513. doi:10.1080/01421590500129159 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  69. Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 77-84. [Google Scholar]
  70. Shepard, L. (2005). Linking formative assessment to scaffolding. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 66-71. [Google Scholar]
  71. Solgun-Günel, A. (2014). The effects of formative assessment on students’ participation in an Englısh language program. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Çağ University, Mersin, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  72. Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. Abingdon, England: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  73. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Essex: Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  74. Tan, K. (2011). Assessment for learning reform in Singapore – quality, sustainable or threshold? In R. Berry & B. Adamson (Eds.), Assessment reform in education: Policy and practice (pp. 75-87). London: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  75. Taras, M. (2002). Using assessment for learning and learning from assessment.  Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 501–510. [Google Scholar]
  76. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches ın the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  77. Tekin, E. G. (2010). Matematik eğitiminde biçimlendirici değerlendirmenin etkisi. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  78. Tierney, R. D., & Charland, J. (2007, April). Stocks and prospects: Research on formative assessment in secondary classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. [Google Scholar]
  79. Van Evera, W. C. (2003). Achievement and motivation in the middle school science classroom: The effects of formative assessment feedback (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Available from ProOuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3110082) [Google Scholar]
  80. Wood, D. F. (2010). Formative assessment. In T. Swanwick (Ed.), Understanding medical education: Evidence, theory and practice (pp. 259-270). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  81. Yalaki, Y. (2010). Simple formative assessment, high learning gains in college general chemistry. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 40, 223-240. [Google Scholar]
  82. Yin, Y. (2005). The influence of formative assessments on student motivation, achievement, and conceptual change (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProOuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3186430) [Google Scholar]
  83. Yin, Y., Shavelson, R. J., Ayala, C. C., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M., … & Young, D. B. (2008). On the impact of formative assessment on student motivation, achievement, and conceptual change. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 355-359. doi:10.1080/08957340802347845 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  84. Yorke, M. (2001). Formative assessment and its relevance to retention. Higher Education Research and Development, 20(2), 115-26. [Google Scholar]
  85. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boakaerts, P. R. Pintrich, P. R. & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]