PEN Academic Publishing   |  ISSN: 1554-5210

International Journal of Progressive Education 2018, Vol. 14(4) 1-14

Views of Instructors about Academic Productivity

Nazife Karadağ

pp. 1 - 14   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2018.154.1   |  Manu. Number: MANU-1803-13-0001.R1

Published online: September 11, 2018  |   Number of Views: 18  |  Number of Download: 68


Abstract

The purpose of the study is to determine the views of the instructors about the experiences they have during the international publishing in terms of academic productivity.  The study aims to reveal the problems the instructors experience during the publication process in international journal indexes and in the journals like SSCI, SCI and AHCI and to determine the needs of the instructors in order them to succeed in this process.  In the study, one of the qualitative methods, phenomenological research design was used. The study group consists of 15 instructors determined by criterion sampling within the purposive sampling methods. The basic criterion in determining the study group is that the instructors should complete the doctoral degree in Turkey in the last 10 years or abroad and they should have international publications. The data of the study were collected with semi-structured interview forms. based on the sub-problems of the study and the interviews with the instructors, the following issues were discussed about: the purposes of the instructors in overseas publishing,  their experiences in international publishing, the factors motivating themselves for international publishing, if there is, the reason why they didn’t want to publish in foreign countries and somehow the reason why they didn’t want to publish in the journals in the country, the difficulties they encountered with during the process of international publishing, the strategies  they followed during the publication and their recommendations for the researches who wish to make publishing abroad. 

Keywords: Productivity, academic productivity, higher education


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Karadag, N. (2018). Views of Instructors about Academic Productivity. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(4), 1-14. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2018.154.1

Harvard
Karadag, N. (2018). Views of Instructors about Academic Productivity. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(4), pp. 1-14.

Chicago 16th edition
Karadag, Nazife (2018). "Views of Instructors about Academic Productivity". International Journal of Progressive Education 14 (4):1-14. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2018.154.1.

References
  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2009). Research collaboration and productivity: is there correlation?. Higher Education57(2), 155-171.
  • Ak, M. Z., & Gülmez, A. (2006). Türkiye’nin uluslararası yayın performansının analizi. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi1(1). 22-49.
  • Alonso-Arroyo, A., Gómez-Guardeño, E., González-Sanjuán, M. E., & Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2013). Barrıers to the scıentıfıc productıon of the female unıversıty teachers of the health scıences areas. Brazilian Journal of Information Science7(1).
  • Atasoylu A. A, Wright S. M, Beasley B. W, Cofrancesco J. Jr, Macpherson DS, Partridge T, et al (2003). Promotion criteria for clinician-educators. J Gen Intern Med 18, 711–716.
  • Bland, C. J., Center, B. A., Finstad, D. A., Risbey, K. R., & Staples, J. G. (2005). A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity. Academic Medicine80(3), 225-237.
  • Brusa, J., Carter, M., & Heilman, G. E. (2010). Academic content, research productivity, and tenure. Journal of Economics and Finance34(1), 46-60.
  • Carayol, N. and Matt  M. (2004). Individual and collective determinants of academic scientists’ productivity. Information Economics and Policy, 18, 55-72.
  • Defazio, D., Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2009). Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program. Research policy38(2), 293-305.
  • Diamond, S. J., Thomas Jr, C. R., Desai, S., Holliday, E. B., Jagsi, R., Schmitt, C., & Enestvedt, B. K. (2016). Gender differences in publication productivity, academic rank, and career duration among US academic gastroenterology faculty. Academic Medicine91(8), 1158-1163.
  • Dietz, J. S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research policy34(3), 349-367.
  • Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. R. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in higher education39(6), 607-631.
  • Eti, S. (2003). Üniversitelerdeki akademik üretkenliğe etki eden faktörlerin incelenmesi. Journal of Behavior at Work. 1 (1), 87-93.
  • Gantman, E. R. (2012). Economic, linguistic, and political factors in the scientific productivity of countries. Scientometrics93(3), 967-985.
  • G, Yinian.,  ve  Zainab, A. N. (2001). Publication productivity of Malaysian researchers in the field of Computer Science and Information Technology. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science6(1), 1-23.
  • Green, R. G. (1998) “Faculty rank, effort and success”, Journal of Social Work Education, 34(3), 415-426.
  • Horodnic, I. A., & Zaiţ, A. (2015). Motivation and research productivity in a university system undergoing transition. Research Evaluation24(3), 282-292.
  • Huang, H. H., & Hsu, J. S. C. (2005). An evaluation of publication productivity in information systems: 1999 to 2003. Communications of the Association for Information Systems15(1), 31.
  • Keys, C. W. (1999). Revitalizing instruction in scientific genres: Connecting knowledge production with writing to learn in science. Science education83(2), 115-130.
  • Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702.
  • Lee, J. H.W., (2008). How to write a good paper for a top international journal.  Elsevier Author Workshop Hohai University.  https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/international%20publishing%20china.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 28.02.2018
  • Levin, S. G., & Stephan, P. E. (1991). Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. The American Economic Review, 114-132.
  • Ma, Y., & Runyon, L. R. (2004). Academic synergy in the age of technology—A new instructional paradigm. Journal of Education for Business79(6), 367-371.
  • Merriam, S. B. (1998).  Qualitative research and case study applications in education. revised and expanded from" case study research in educationJossey-Bass Publishers, 350 Sansome St, San Francisco, CA 94104.
  • Mishra, V., & Smyth, R. (2013). Are more senior academics really more research productive than junior academics? Evidence from Australian law schools. Scientometrics96(2), 411-425.
  • Nieuwoudt, M. J., & Wilcocks, J. S. (2005). The attitudes and perceptions of South African accounting academics about research. Meditari: Research Journal of the School of Accounting Sciences, 13(2), 49-66.
  • OECD (2009). Globalısatıon and hıgher educatıon: What mıght the future brıng? Erişim Adresi: https://www.oecd.org/edu/imhe/44302672.pdf
  • Rauber, M. and Ursprung, H. W. (2008). Evaluation of researchers: A life cycle analysis of german academic economists’, In: Scientific Competition, Conferences on New Political Economy, pp. 100–123. Tubingen: Mohr Siebek
  • Rushton, J. P., and Meltzer, S. (1981). Research productivity, university revenue, and scholarly impact (citations) of 169 British, Canadian, and United States universities. Scientometrics 3: 275-303.
  • Santo, S. A., Engstrom, M. E., Reetz, L., Schweinle, W. E., & Reed, K. (2009). Faculty productivity barriers and supports at a school of education. Innovative Higher Education34(2), 117-129.
  • Smeby, J. C., & Try, S. (2005). Departmental contexts and faculty research activity in Norway. Research in Higher Education46(6), 593-619.
  • Smeltzer, S. C., Sharts-Hopko, N. C., Cantrell, M. A., Heverly, M. A., Wise, N. J., Jenkinson, A., & Nthenge, S. (2014). Challenges to research productivity of doctoral program nursing faculty. Nursing Outlook62(4), 268-274.
  • Vasil, L. (1993). Gender difference in the academic career in New Zealand universities. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 28(2)143-153.
  • Wissema, J. G. (2009). Üçüncü kuşak üniversitelere doğru, (Özyeğin Üniversitesi, Çev.) İstanbul: Özyeğin Üniversitesi Yayınları
  • Wood, F. (1990). Factors influencing research performance of university academic staff.  Higher Education19(1), 81-100.
  • Youn, T. I., & Price, T. M. (2009). Learning from the experience of others: The evolution of faculty tenure and promotion rules in comprehensive institutions. The Journal of Higher Education80(2), 204-237.
  • Zhang, X. (2014). Factors that motivate academic staff to conduct research and influence research productivity in Chinese Project 211 universities. Doctoral dissertation, University of Canberra.