PEN Academic Publishing   |  ISSN: 1554-5210

International Journal of Progressive Education 2018, Vol. 14(4) 37-51

Engineering Major Students' Perceptions of Nanotechnology

Hasan Yolcu & Melissa A. Dyehouse

pp. 37 - 51   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2018.154.4   |  Manu. Number: MANU-1805-30-0004.R1

Published online: September 11, 2018  |   Number of Views: 12  |  Number of Download: 55


Abstract

Nanotechnology will be among the most needed workforce areas in the near future. It is also a creative and highly dynamic field of innovative research areas that displays numerous open fields for future graduates. The central thesis of this paper is to better understand undergraduate engineering students’ awareness, exposure, and motivation towards nanotechnology, how those constructs correlate with each other, and whether there are differences by gender or year of study. This exploratory study used mixed methods to answer the research question. Results revealed that engineering students have more motivation to pursue further nanotechnology knowledge or study than they have exposure or awareness about nanotechnology. The results showed that male students have more awareness about nanotechnology than female students. Educational implications are that it is necessary to provide students with more opportunities to learn about and study nanotechnology during their undergraduate experience. While students are interested in learning more, their current levels of awareness and exposure may hold them back in pursuing nanotechnology-related careers.

Keywords: Nanotechnology, Engineering students, Perception


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Yolcu, H. & Dyehouse, M.A. (2018). Engineering Major Students' Perceptions of Nanotechnology. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(4), 37-51. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2018.154.4

Harvard
Yolcu, H. and Dyehouse, M. (2018). Engineering Major Students' Perceptions of Nanotechnology. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(4), pp. 37-51.

Chicago 16th edition
Yolcu, Hasan and Melissa A. Dyehouse (2018). "Engineering Major Students' Perceptions of Nanotechnology". International Journal of Progressive Education 14 (4):37-51. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2018.154.4.

References
  • Ambrogi, P., Caselli, M., Montalti, M., & Venturi, M. (2008). Make sense of nanochemistry and nanotechnology. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(1), 5-10.
  • Balasubramanian, G. & Meliabari, A. A. (2016). Teaching nanoscale heat transfer: From a one-week module, to an undergraduate technical elective, to a graduate course. Journal of Nano Education, 8 (2), 126-132.
  • Bhushan, B. (2015). Governance, policy, and legislation of nanotechnology: A perspective. Microsystem TeJackman, J. A., Cho, D.-J., Lee, J., Chen, J. M., Besenbacher, F., Bonnell, D. A., … Cho, N.-J. (2009). Nanotechnology Education for the Global World: Training the Leaders of Tomorrow. ACS Nano.
  • Blonder, R., & Dinur, M. (2011). Teaching nanotechnology using student-centered pedagogy for increasing students' continuing motivation. Journal of Nano Education, 3(1-2), 51-61.
  • Blonder, R., & Sakhnini, S. (2012). Teaching two basic nanotechnology concepts in secondary school by using a variety of teaching methods. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(4), 500-516.
  • Borrego, M. J., Padilla, M. A., Guili, Z., Ohland, M. W., & Anderson, T. J. (2005, October). Graduation rates, grade-point average, and changes of major of female and minority students entering engineering. Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • Chang, R. P. H. (2006). A call for nanoscience education. Nano Today, 1(2), 6-7.
  • Chen, M.-F., Lin, Y.-P., & Cheng, T.-J. (2013). Public attitudes toward nanotechnology applications in taiwan. Technovation, 33(2–3), 88-96.
  • Creswell, John W., V. L. Plano Clark, and A. L. Garrett. "Advances in mixed methods research." (2008): 66-83.
  • Cobb M. D. (2011) Creating informed public opinion: Citizen deliberation about nanotechnologies for human enhancements. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 13, 1533–1548.Cobb, M.D., & Macoubrie, J. (2004). Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 6, 395-405.
  • Drane, D., Swarat, S., Light, G., Hersam, M., & Mason, T. (2009). An Evaluation of the Efficacy and Transferability of a Nanoscience Module. Journal of Nano Education, 1(1), 8-14. doi: 10.1166/jne.2009.001
  • Dyehouse, M. A., Diefes-Dux, H. A., Bennett, D. E., & Imbrie, P. K. (2008). Development of an instrument to measure undergraduates' nanotechnology awareness, exposure, motivation, and knowledge. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 500-510.
  • Farshchi, P., Sadrnezhaad, S. K., Nejad, N. M., Mahmoodi, M., & Abadi, L. I. G. (2011). Nanotechnology in the public eye: The case of iran, as a developing country. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 13(8), 3511-3519.
  • Ghattas, N. I., & Carver, J. S. (2012). Integrating nanotechnology into school education: A review of the literature. Research in Science & Technological Education, 30(3), 271-284.
  • Goodhew, P. (2006). Education moves to a new scale. Nano Today, 1(2), 40-43.
  • Greenberg, A. (2009). Integrating nanoscience into the classroom: Perspectives on nanoscience education projects. Acs Nano, 3(4), 762-769.
  • Hanoglu, O., Douglas, K. A., Madhavan, K., & Diefes-Dux, H. (2015). First-year engineering students' nanotechnology awareness, exposure and motivation before and after educational interventions. Paper presented at the Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE.
  • Jackman, J. A., Cho, D.-J., Lee, J., Chen, J. M., Besenbacher, F., Bonnell, D. A., … Cho, N.-J. (2009). Nanotechnology Education for the Global World: Training the Leaders of Tomorrow. ACS Nano.
  • Jones, M. G., Blonder, R., Gardner, G. E., Albe, V., Falvo, M., & Chevrier, J. (2013). Nanotechnology and nanoscale science: Educational challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 35(9), 1490-1512.
  • Karataş, F. Ö. (2015). Kimya öğrencilerinin nanobilim ve nanoteknoloji konularındaki bilgi düzeyleri. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 11(3), 103-118.
  • Macoubrie, J. (2005). Informed public perceptions of nanotechnology and trust in government. http://www.pewtrusts.com/pdf/Nanotech_0905.pdf.
  • Malsch, I. (2014). Nano-education from a european perspective: Nano-training for non-r&d jobs. Nanotechnology Reviews, 3(2), 211-221. doi:10.1515/ntrev-2013-0039
  • McNally, H. A. (2013). Maximizing nanotechnology education at Purdue University. IEEE Nanotechnology Magazine, 7, 19-22 . 
  • Miller, P. H., Rosser, S. V., Benigno, J. P., & Zieseniss, M. L. (2000). A desire to help others: Goals of high-achieving female science undergraduates. Women's Studies Quarterly, 28(1&2), 128-142.
  • Moyses, D. D., Rivet, J. L., & Fahlman, B. D. (2010). Using Concept Maps To Teach a Nanotechnology Survey Short Course. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(3), 285–290.
  • Marikar, F. M. M. T., Ilangakoon, P. I. P. W., Jaliya, S. H., Jayasena, L. D., Kalavitigoda, S. K. P. B., Koralagedara, K. I. S., & Kulathunga, S. P. S. N. (2014). Sri lankan medical undergraduates awareness of nanotechnology and its risks. Education Research International, 2014.
  • Newberry, D. (2011, August). Nanotechnology education: The impact of and on electrical engineering. Proceedings of the 2011 11th IEEE International Conference on Nanotechnology. Portland, Oregon, 800-803.
  • Norio. Taniguchi, "On the Basic Concept of 'Nano-Technology'," Proc. Intl. Conf. Prod. Eng. Tokyo, Part II, Japan Society of Precision Engineering, 1974.
  • O'Connor, C., & Hayden, H. (2008). Contextualising nanotechnology in chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(1), 35-42.
  • Pagliaro, M. (2015). Advancing nanochemistry education. Chemistry-a European Journal, 21(34), 11931-11936.
  • Porter, A. L., & Youtie, J. (2009). How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology? Journal of nanoparticle research, 11(5), 1023-1041.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686.
  • Sobolev, K. (2016). Modern developments related to nanotechnology and nanoengineering of concrete. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 10(2), 131–141.
  • Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 859-884.
  • Taniguchi, N. (1974). On the basic concept of nanotechnology. In Proc. Intl. Conf. Prod. Eng. Tokyo, Part II, Japan Society of Precision Engineering (pp. 18–23).
  • Ramsden, J. J. (2014). Chapter 1 - what is nanotechnology? In J. J. Ramsden (Ed.), Applied nanotechnology (second edition) (pp. 3-12). Oxford: William Andrew Publishing.
  • Roco, M. C. (2003). Converging science and technology at the nanoscale: Opportunities for education and training. Nature Biotechnology, 21(10), 1247-1249.
  • Roduner, E. (2006). Size matters: Why nanomaterials are different. Chemical Society Reviews, 35(7), 583-592.
  • Sahin, N., & Ekli, E. (2013). Nanotechnology awareness, opinions and risk perceptions among middle school students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(4), 867-881.
  • Senocak, E. (2015). A course to create informed Turkish undergraduate students on nanotechnology. Journal of Nano Education, 7(1), 52-57.
  • Sobolev, K. (2016). Modern developments related to nanotechnology and nanoengineering of concrete. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 10(2), 131–141.
  • Sakhnini, S., & Blonder, R. (2015). Essential concepts of nanoscale science and technology for high school students based on a delphi study by the expert community. International Journal of Science Education, 37(11), 1699-1738.
  • Senocak, E. (2014). A survey on nanotechnology in the view of the turkish public. Science Technology & Society, 19(1), 79-94.
  • Uddin, Mahbub., Chowdhury, & Raj., A. (2001). Integration nanotechnology into the undergraduate engineering curriculum. Paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering Education, Oslo, Norway.
  • Waldron, A. M., Spencer, D., & Batt, C. A. (2006). The current state of public understanding of nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 8(5), 569-575.
  • de Zilva D, Vu L, Newell BR, Pearson. J. (2013). Exposure is not enough: Suppressing stimuli from awareness can abolish the mere exposure effect. PLoS ONE 8(10): e77726.