PEN Academic Publishing   |  ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2019, Vol. 15(6) 66-82

An Effective Method to Develop Watching/Listening Comprehension Skills In Turkish Teaching

Dilek Ünveren Kapanadze

pp. 66 - 82   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2019.215.5   |  Manu. Number: MANU-1907-24-0005

Published online: December 08, 2019  |   Number of Views: 54  |  Number of Download: 174


Abstract

Traditional and frequently used approaches to develop listening skills and listening teaching mostly word and sentence-centered instead of a holistic approach to the meaning of a discourse; disregarding the fact that words and sentences gain meaning in a discourse, i.e in a context. Therefore, listening should be regarded as an active process, however traditional listening approaches regard listening asa passive / and static process. Thus, in this research, a new approach to listening teaching, a discourse-oriented approach was studied, introduced and offered to eliminate these defiencies. The research was designed as one-group pre-test post-test experimental study to determine the effect of discourse analysis on the given sample of 17 students in 5th grade. As data collection instruments, an identification form, achievement tests, evaluation forms and a questionairre were developed and used in the process. Correlation analysis, t-test and regression analysis were employed to analyse the data. As a result of the study, it was found that listening skills of the students were improved in the process through discourse analysis method by comprehending the material listened/watched thoroughly. The improvement was reflected in the comparison of their pre and post test results and showed in tables. Moreover, their gradual progress was evaluated through the criteria developed and demonstrated in graphs. Additionally, students developed positive opinions about using a discourse-oriented approach to improve listening skills which was reflected on their responses for the questionnaire items.

Keywords: Turkish teaching, listening/watching skills, discourse analysis method


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Kapanadze, D.U. (2019). An Effective Method to Develop Watching/Listening Comprehension Skills In Turkish Teaching . International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(6), 66-82. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2019.215.5

Harvard
Kapanadze, D. (2019). An Effective Method to Develop Watching/Listening Comprehension Skills In Turkish Teaching . International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(6), pp. 66-82.

Chicago 16th edition
Kapanadze, Dilek Unveren (2019). "An Effective Method to Develop Watching/Listening Comprehension Skills In Turkish Teaching ". International Journal of Progressive Education 15 (6):66-82. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2019.215.5.

References
  1. Allen, M. (2017). The sage encyclopedia of communication research methods (Vols. 1-4). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE  [Google Scholar]
  2. Ailes, R. (1996). Mesaj sizsiniz-Kendiniz olun istediğinizi elde edin (çev. A. Önder), İstanbul: Sistem yayıncılık [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self regulation and other even more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert, & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding, 65-116. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar]
  4. Buzan, T. (2001). Aklını en iyi şekilde kullan. İstanbul: Arion yayınevi [Google Scholar]
  5. Cemiloğlu, M. (2004). İlköğretim okullarında Türkçe öğretimi. Bursa: Alfa Akademi Yayınları [Google Scholar]
  6. Cook, G. (1989). Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cots, J.M. (1996). Bringing discourse analysis into the language classroom, Links & Letters 3, 77-101 [Google Scholar]
  8. Demirel, Ö. (2003). İlköğretim okullarında Türkçe öğretimi. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  9. Doğan, Y. (2011). Dinleme eğitimi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi  [Google Scholar]
  10. Emiroğlu, S. & Pınar, F.N. (2013). Dinleme becerisinin diğer beceri alanları ile ilişkisi. Turkish Studies, 8 (4), 769-782. [Google Scholar]
  11. Eryaman, M. Y. (2008). Writing, method and hermeneutics: Towards an existential pedagogy. Elementary Education Online, 7(1), 2-14. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ergin, A. &  Birol, C. (2000). Eğitimde iletişim. Ankara: Anı Yayınevi. [Google Scholar]
  13. Field, J. (1999). Bottom-up and top-down. ELT Journal, 53 (4), 338-9. [Google Scholar]
  14. Flavel, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving.  In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence, 231-235. Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erbaum [Google Scholar]
  15. Gündüz, O. & Şimşek, T. (2014). Dinleme eğitimi. [Listening training]. Ankara: Grafiker Yayınları [Google Scholar]
  16. Güneş, F. (2007). Türkçe öğretimi ve zihinsel yapılandırma. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları [Google Scholar]
  17. Hatch, E. (1992). Discourse and language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. Pride & J. Holrnes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics, 269-293. Hardmonsworth, England: Penguin [Google Scholar]
  19. Johns, A. (1997). Text, role and context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  20. Karasar, N. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kardaş, M.N & Harre, T. (2015).  6-8 sinif öğrencilerinin Türkçe dinleme/izleme becerilerini geliştirmeye yönelik etkinlik önerileri. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3 (13), 264-291 [Google Scholar]
  22. Maxwell, J. & Dornan, J. (2001) Etkili insan olmak, (Çev. Demet Dizman), İstanbul: Sistem yayıncılık [Google Scholar]
  23. McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  24. McCarthy, M. & Carter, R. (1994). Language as discourse: Perspectives for language teaching. London: Longman [Google Scholar]
  25. Melanlıoğlu, D. (2012). Dinleme becerisine yönelik ölçme değerlendirme çalışmalarında üstbiliş stratejilerinin kullanımı. Turkish Studies, 7(1), 1583-1595. [Google Scholar]
  26. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  27. Nunan, D. (1993). Introducing discourse analysis. London: Penguin. [Google Scholar]
  28. Olshtain, D. & Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Discourse analysis and language teaching. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 707-724. London: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  29. Oluwatayo, J. (2012). Validity and reliability issues in educational research. Journal of Educational and Social Research 2, 391-400. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ridgway, T. (2000). Listenin strategies-I beg your pardon. ELT Journal, 54 (2),179-185 [Google Scholar]
  31. Seçer, İ. (2017). SPSS ve LISREL ile pratik veri analizi [Practical data analysis through SPSS and LISREL]. Ankara: Anı [Google Scholar]
  32. Taşer, S. (2000). Konuşma eğitimi. İstanbul: Papirus Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  33. Temur, T. (2001). Dinleme becerisi-konu alanı ders kitabı inceleme kılavuzu Türkçe 1–8. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  34. Tompkins, G. (1998). Language arts  content  and  teaching  strategies. New Jersey:  California State University. Prentice-Hall Inc. [Google Scholar]
  35. Umagan, S. (2007). Dinleme-İlköğretimde Türkçe öğretimi. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wacker, K. G. & Hawkins, K. (1996). Curricula comparison for classes in listening, International Journal of Listening, 10, 14-28. [Google Scholar]
  37. Yalçın, A. (2002). Türkçe öğretim yöntemleri. Ankara: Akçağ Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  38. Yılmaz, İ. (2007). Türkçe öğretiminde dinleme becerisini geliştirmeye yönelik önerilen etkinliklerin değerlendirilmesi, Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Niğde Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Niğde [Google Scholar]