PEN Academic Publishing   |  ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2020, Vol. 16(1) 84-99

A Longitudinal Study of a New Science Teacher’s Beliefs and Classroom Practices

Ozgur Kivilcan Dogan, Mustafa Cakir, John W. Tillotson, Monica Young & Robert E. Yager

pp. 84 - 99   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.7   |  Manu. Number: MANU-1910-19-0003.R1

Published online: February 09, 2020  |   Number of Views: 28  |  Number of Download: 100


Abstract

Teachers’ educational beliefs influence their decisions and actions before, during, and after class. Classroom actions are a result of decision-making processes wherein teachers judge how they can teach effectively. The early years of teaching profession is important in shaping new teachers’ practices in accordance with their beliefs. This study identifies how the beliefs and classroom practices of a new science teacher change within the first three years of working. This study’s participant was a new high-school science teacher in Midwestern United States. Changes were investigated by employing qualitative research methods. Data for this longitudinal case study were gathered from interviews, questionnaires, and classroom observations for three years. The findings show that teachers cannot practice their reformist beliefs without experiencing real class environments.

Keywords: epistemological beliefs; new science teachers; pedagogical beliefs; teacher beliefs


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Dogan, O.K., Cakir, M., Tillotson, J.W., Young, M. & Yager, R.E. (2020). A Longitudinal Study of a New Science Teacher’s Beliefs and Classroom Practices . International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(1), 84-99. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.7

Harvard
Dogan, O., Cakir, M., Tillotson, J., Young, M. and Yager, R. (2020). A Longitudinal Study of a New Science Teacher’s Beliefs and Classroom Practices . International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(1), pp. 84-99.

Chicago 16th edition
Dogan, Ozgur Kivilcan, Mustafa Cakir, John W. Tillotson, Monica Young and Robert E. Yager (2020). "A Longitudinal Study of a New Science Teacher’s Beliefs and Classroom Practices ". International Journal of Progressive Education 16 (1):84-99. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.7.

References
  1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar]
  2. Akkoc, H., & Ogan-Bekiroglu, F. (2006). Relationship between pre-service mathematics teachers’ teaching and learning beliefs and their practices. Paper presented at the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME). Prague, Czech Republic. [Google Scholar]
  3. Al Said, R. S., Du, X., ALKhatib, H. A. H., Romanowski, M. H., & Barham, A. I. I. (2019). Math Teachers’ Beliefs, Practices, and Belief Change in Implementing Problem Based Learning in Qatari Primary Governmental School. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(5). [Google Scholar]
  4. Authors, 2010 [details removed for peer review] [Google Scholar]
  5. Authors, 2011 [details removed for peer review] [Google Scholar]
  6. Authors, 2013 [details removed for peer review] [Google Scholar]
  7. Authors, 2013 [details removed for peer review] [Google Scholar]
  8. Authors, 2015 [details removed for peer review] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers' Beliefs About the Nature of Science and Their Relationship to Classroom Practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 53–62. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bogar, Y. (2019). Literature Review on Inquiry-Based Learning in Science Education. International Journal of Science and Education 1(2), 91-118. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming Again, Again, and Again. Educatıonal Researcher, 19(1), 3–13. [Google Scholar]
  12. Deutschman, A., & Keeler, B. (2007). Change or die. Harper Audio. [Google Scholar]
  13. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2003). What new teachers need to learn. Educational Leadership, 60(8): 25–29. [Google Scholar]
  14. Fletcher, S. S., & Luft, J. A. (2011). Early career secondary science teachers: A longitudinal study of beliefs in relation to field experiences. Science Education, 95(6): 1124–1146. [Google Scholar]
  15. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. Columbia University, USA: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  16. Furtak, E. M. (2006). The Dilemma of Guidance in Scientific Inquiry Teaching (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation) Stanford University, Stanford, CA. [Google Scholar]
  17. Haney, J. J., & McArthur, J. (2002). Four case studies of prospective science teachers' beliefs concerning constructivist teaching practices. Science Education, 8(6), 783–802. [Google Scholar]
  18. Haney, J. J., Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(9), 971-993. [Google Scholar]
  19. Holland, J., Thomson, R., & Henderson, S. (2006). Qualitative longitudinal research: A discussion paper. London: London South Bank University. [Google Scholar]
  20. Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Capturing science teachers’ epistemological beliefs: The development of the teacher beliefs interview. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11(2), 38-63. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lumpe, A. T., Haney, J. J., & Czerniak, C. M. (1998). Science teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the use of cooperative learning. School Science and Mathematics, 98(3), 123–135. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ogan-Bekiroglu, F., & Akkoc, H. (2009). Pre-service teachers’ instructional beliefs and examination of consistency between beliefs and practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(6), 1173–1199. [Google Scholar]
  23. Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 3rd Ed. California: SAGE Publications, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  24. Richardson, L., & Simmons, P. (1994). Self-Q research method and analysis, teacher pedagogical philosophy interview: Theoretical background and samples of data. Athens, GA: University of Georgia. [Google Scholar]
  25. Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes and values: A theory of organization and change. Jossey-Bass, Inc. Behavioral science series. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sampson, V., & Benton, A. (2006). Development and validation of the beliefs about reformed science teaching and learning (BARSTL) questionnaire. Paper presented at the ASTE. Portland, Oregon. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sawada, D., Piburn, M. D., Judson, E., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., & Bloom, I. (2002). Measuring reform practices in science and mathematics classrooms: The reformed teaching observation protocol. School Science and Mathematics, 102(6), 245–253. [Google Scholar]
  28. Taylor, P. C., White, L. R., & Fraser, B. J. (1994). A classroom environment questionnaire for science educators interested in the constructivist reform of school science. In: Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), March 1994. Anaheim, California. [Google Scholar]
  29. Tobin, K. (1990). Changing metaphors and beliefs: A master switch for teaching?. Theory into practice, 29(2), 122–127. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tsai, C. C. (2002). Nested epistemologies: science teachers' beliefs of teaching, learning and science. International journal of science education, 24(8), 771-783 [Google Scholar]
  31. Walkington, J. (2005). Becoming a teacher: Encouraging development of teacher identity through reflective practice. Asia-Pacific Journal of teacher education, 33(1), 53-64. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wallace, C. S. & Brooks, L. (2015). Learning to Teach Elementary Science in an Experiental Informal Context: Culture, Learning, and Identity. Science Education, 99(1), 174–198. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wallace, C. S., & Kang, N-H. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers' beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets. Journal of research in science teaching, 41(9), 936–960. [Google Scholar]
  34. Waters‐Adams, S. (2006). The relationship between understanding of the nature of science and practice: The influence of teachers’ beliefs about education, teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(8), 919-944. [Google Scholar]