PEN Academic Publishing   |  ISSN: 1554-5210

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2020, Vol. 16(5) 443-458

21st Century Skills: The Predictive Role of Attitudes Regarding STEM Education and Problem-Based Learning

Nur Akcanca

pp. 443 - 458   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.277.27   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2005-18-0004.R1

Published online: October 09, 2020  |   Number of Views: 12  |  Number of Download: 25


Abstract

The objective of this research is to determine the predictive situation of the proficiency perceptions of preschool teacher candidates' attitudes regarding STEM Education and Problem-Based Learning (PBL) towards 21st century skills. Within the scope of this objective, correlational survey design, one of the quantitative research methods, was used. The sample of the research consisted of a total of 284 teacher candidates studying in the Department of Preschool Education. In order to measure the 21st century skills of the teacher candidates according to their own perspective, the ‘21st Century Skills and Competences Scale’ was used. To measure the attitudes of the teacher candidates towards STEM education, the 'STEM Education Attitude Scale'was used. In addition, the 'Problem-Based Learning Attitude Scale' was employed to identify the candidates' attitudes towards problem-based learning. Standard multiple linear regression analysis was performed while analyzing the data. As a result of the research, it was observed that the attitudes of the preschool teacher candidates regarding STEM education and PBL had a moderate and meaningful relationship with their proficiency perceptions towards 21st century skills. Additionally, it was found out that the candidates' attitudes towards STEM education and PBL explained 20% of their proficiency perceptions towards 21st century skills.  In the light of the results obtained from the research, in order for preschool teacher candidates and teachers to design appropriate and qualified learning environments, it is suggested that they can be compared with enriched teaching practices that will be supported with different and innovative approaches, such as STEM and PBL, and structured in the focus of developing 21st century skills.

Keywords: 21st Century Skills, STEM Education, Problem-Based Learning, Preschool Teacher Candidates


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Akcanca, N. (2020). 21st Century Skills: The Predictive Role of Attitudes Regarding STEM Education and Problem-Based Learning . International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(5), 443-458. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2020.277.27

Harvard
Akcanca, N. (2020). 21st Century Skills: The Predictive Role of Attitudes Regarding STEM Education and Problem-Based Learning . International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(5), pp. 443-458.

Chicago 16th edition
Akcanca, Nur (2020). "21st Century Skills: The Predictive Role of Attitudes Regarding STEM Education and Problem-Based Learning ". International Journal of Progressive Education 16 (5):443-458. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2020.277.27.

References
  1. Acar, D. (2020). The role of STEM awareness in predicting the contribution of teachers’ problem-solving skills and behaviors to the development of creative thinking. Academia Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 77-89.  [Google Scholar]
  2. Akgündüz, D. (2018) (Ed.). Theoretical Framework and Historical Development of STEM Education. In STEM education in Pre-School to University Theory and Practice (pp. 19-47). Ankara: Anı Publishing.  [Google Scholar]
  3. Akgündüz, D. & Akpınar, B. C. (2018). STEM applications in preschool education. In D. Akgündüz (Ed.), STEM education in Pre-School to University Theory and Practice (pp. 135-164). Ankara: Anı Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  4. Aldemir, J. & Kermani, H. (2017). Integrated STEM curriculum: Improving educational outcomes for Head Start children. Early Child Development & Care, 187(11), 1694-1706. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004 430.2016.11851 02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  5. Alexander, C., Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Tyler-Wood, T. & Bull, G. (2014). The impact of project-based learning on pre-service teachers’ technology attitudes and skills. Journal of Computers in Mathematics & Science Teaching, 33(3), 257-282.  [Google Scholar]
  6. Anagün, Ş. S., Atalay, N., Kılıç, Z. & Yaşar, S. (2016). The development of a 21st century skills and competences scale directed at teaching candidates: Validity and reliability study. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 40(40), 160-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.9779/PUJE768 [Google Scholar]
  7. Asghar, A., Ellington, R., Rice, E., Johnson, F. & Prime, G. M. (2012). Supporting STEM education in secondary science contexts. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6(2), 85-125. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1349 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  8. Atiles, J. T., Jones, J. L. & Anderson, J. A. (2013). More than a read aloud: Preparing and inspiring early childhood teachers to develop our future scientists. Teacher Education and Practice, 26(2), 285–299. [Google Scholar]
  9. Berlin, D. F. & White, A. L. (2010). Preservice mathematics and science teachers in an integrated teacher preparation program for grades 7-12: A 3-year study of attitudes and perceptions related to integration. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 97-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9164-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  10. Berlin, D. F. & White, A. L. (2012). A longitudinal look at attitudes and perceptions related to the integration of mathematics, science, and technology education. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00111.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  11. Beswick, K. & Fraser, S. (2019). Developing mathematics teachers’ 21st century competence for teaching in STEM contexts. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51(6), 955-965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01084-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  12. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2016). Scientific research methods (22. edition). Ankara: Pegem Academy. [Google Scholar]
  13. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2008). Data analysis textbook in social sciences (9. edition). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.  [Google Scholar]
  14. Campbell, C., Jobling, W. & Howitt, C. (2018). Science in early childhood. Victoria: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cansoy, R. (2018). 21st century skills according to international frameworks and building them within the education system, Journal of the Human and Social Science Researches, 7(4), 3112-3134. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.494286 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  16. Capraro, R. M, Capraro, M. M. & Morgan J. R. (2013). STEM project-based learning. An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach (2. edition). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  17. Cohrssen, C. & Page, J. (2016). Articulating a rights-based argument for mathematics teaching and learning in early childhood education. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 41(3), 104-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911604100313 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  18. Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). Research on teaching and teacher education and its influences on policy and practice. Educational Researcher, 45(2), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16639597 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  19. Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st Century Skills: Rethinking How Students Learn (pp. 51-76). Bloomington: Solution Tree Press. [Google Scholar]
  20. Derin, G., Aydın, E. & Kırkıç, K. A. (2017). A Scale on the Attitudes towards STEM Education. El-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineering, 4(3), 547-559. https://doi.org/10.31202/ecjse.336550 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  21. Erkuş, A. (2012). Measurement and scale development in psychology-I basic concepts and operations. Ankara: Pegem Academy.  [Google Scholar]
  22. Garay, I. S. & Quintana, M. G. B. (2019, April). 21st Century Skills. An Analysis of Theoretical Frameworks to Guide Educational Innovation Processes in Chilean Context. In the International Research & Innovation Forum (pp. 37-46). Springer, Cham. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gelmez Burakgazi, S., Karsantık, Y., Aktan, T., Ayaz, M. A., Büge, B. C., Karataş, F., ... & Yavaşca, O. (2019). Equipped or not? Investigating pre-service teachers’ 21st century skills. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(4), 451-468. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1671803 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  24. Gökbulut, B. (2020). The relationship between teacher candidates' beliefs in education and 21st century skills, Turkish Studies-Education, 15(1), 127-141. https://dx.doi.org/10.29228/TurkishStudies.40164 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gudmundsdottir, G. B. & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: Implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  26. Günşen, G. & Uyanık Balat, G. (2018). STEM approach in early childhood. In B. Akman, G. Uyanık Balat & T. Güler Yıldız (Ed.), Science Education in Early Childhood (pp: 137-160). Ankara: Anı Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  27. Günüç, S., Odabaşı, H. F. & Kuzu, A. (2013). The defining characteristics of students of the 21st century by student teachers: a twitter activity. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 9(4), 436-455. [Google Scholar]
  28. Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P. & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): A framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203772 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  29. Harris, S., Lowery-Moore, H. & Farrow, V. (2008). Extending transfer of learning theory to transformative learning theory: A model for promoting teacher leadership. Theory into Practice, 47(4), 318-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802329318 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  30. Hedlin, M. & Gunnarsson, G. (2014). Preschool student teachers, technology, and gender: positive expectations despite mixed experiences from their own school days. Early Child Development and Care, 184(12), 1948-1959. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2014.896352 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  31. Karahan, E. (2019). Stem education approach. In A. G. Balım (Ed.), New Approaches in Science Education (pp. 171-186). Ankara: Anı Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  32. Karakoyun, F. & Lindberg, O. J. (2020). Preservice teachers’ views about the twenty-first century skills: A qualitative survey study in Turkey and Sweden. Education and Information Technologies, 4, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10148-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  33. Karasar, N. (2013). Scientific research method (25. edition). Ankara: Nobel Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kay, K. (2010). 21st century skills: Why they matter, what they are, and how we get there. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st Century Skills: Rethinking How Students Learn. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press. [Google Scholar]
  35. Koh, K. & Chapman, O. (2019). Problem-based learning, assessment literacy, mathematics knowledge, and competencies in teacher education. Papers on Postsecondary Learning and Teaching: Proceedings of the University of Calgary Conference on Postsecondary Learning and Teaching, 3,74-80. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kozikoğlu İ. & Altunova N. (2018). The predictive power of prospective teachers’ self-efficacy perceptions of 21st century skills for their lifelong learning tendencies. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 8(3), 522-531. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2018.293 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  37. Krskova, H., Wood, L. N., Breyer, Y. A. & Baumann, C. (2020). F.I.R.S.T: principles of discipline for 21st century skills. In L. Wood, L. P. Tan, Y. A. Breyer, & S. Hawse (Eds.), Industry and Higher Education: Case Studies for Sustainable Futures (pp. 265-289). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0874-5_12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  38. LaForce, M., Noble, E. & Blackwell, C. (2017). Problem-based learning (PBL) and student interest in STEM careers: The roles of motivation and ability beliefs. Education Sciences, 7(4), 92-114. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7040092 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  39. Lapek, J. (2018). Promoting 21st century skills in problem-based learning environments. CTETE-Research Monograph Series, 1(1), 66-85. https://doi.org/10.21061/ctete-rms.v1.c.4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  40. Larson, L. C. & Miller, T. N. (2011). 21st century skills: Prepare students for the future. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47(3), 121-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2011.10516575 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  41. MacDonald, A., Huser, C., Sikder, S. & Danaia, L. (2020). Effective early childhood STEM education: Findings from the little scientists evaluation. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(3), 353-363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-01004-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  42. McCain, T. (2007). Teaching for tomorrow: Teaching content and problem-solving skills. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press. [Google Scholar]
  43. McClure, E., Guernsey, L., Clements, D., Bales, S., Nichols, J., Kendall-Taylor, N., et al. (2017). STEM starts early: Grounding science, technology, engineering, and math education in early childhood. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop. [Google Scholar]
  44. Mirzaie, R. A., Hamidi, F. & Anaraki, A. (2009). A study on the effect of science activities on fostering creativity in preschool children. Journal of Turkish science education, 6(3), 81-90. [Google Scholar]
  45. Morrison, J., Roth McDuffie, A. & French, B. (2015). Identifying key components of teaching and learning in a STEM school. School of Science & Mathematics, 115(5), 244-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12126 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  46. Mutiani, M. & Faisal, M. (2020). Urgency of the 21st century skills and social capital in social studies. The Innovation of Social Studies Journal, 1(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.20527/iis.v1i1.1256 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  47. OECD. (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies executive summary. Accessed 20 April 2019 https://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf [Google Scholar]
  48. O'Neal, L. J., Gibson, P. & Cotten, S. R. (2017). Elementary school teachers' beliefs about the role of technology in 21st-century teaching and learning. Computers in the Schools, 34(3), 192-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2017.1347443 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  49. Ong, E. T., Ayob, A., Ibrahim, M. N., Adnan, M., Shariff, J. & Ishak, N. (2016). The effectiveness of an in-service training of early childhood teachers on STEM integration through Project-Based Inquiry Learning. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(special), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10170a [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  50. Orhan Göksün, D. & Kurt, A. A. (2017). The relationship between pre-service teachers’ use of 21st century learner skills and 21st century teacher skills. Education and Science, 42(190), 107-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.7089 [Google Scholar]
  51. Palant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (3. edition). Berkshire: Open University Press. [Google Scholar]
  52. Park, E. K. & Suh, J. K. (2020, November). Active learning using google suites for education to promote 21st-century skills. Transforming Teaching Through Active Learning A National Symposium, Miami, Florida. [Google Scholar]
  53. Park, M. H., Dimitrov, D. M., Patterson, L. G. & Park, D. Y. (2017). Early childhood teachers’ beliefs about readiness for teaching science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 15(3), 275-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/14767 18X15 61404 0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  54. P21 (2019). Framework for 21st century learning. Partnership for 21st century learning a network of Battelle for kids. Accessed 15 April 2019 http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_Brief.pdf [Google Scholar]
  55. Rotherham, A. J. & Willingham, D. T. (2010). 21st century skills: Not new, but a worthy challenge. American Educator, 34(1), 17-20. [Google Scholar]
  56. Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows, 9, 5-15. [Google Scholar]
  57. Sayın, Z. & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2016, February). Coding education as a new 21st century skill and effect of coding on educational policies. Academic Informatics Conference, Aydın, Turkey. [Google Scholar]
  58. Simoncini, K. & Lasen, M. (2018). Ideas about STEM among Australian early childhood professionals: How important is STEM in early childhood education? International Journal of Early Childhood, 50, 353-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-018-0229-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  59. Tee, M. Y. & Lee, S. S. (2013). Advancing understanding using Nonaka’s model of knowledge creation and problem-based learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(3), 313-331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9175-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  60. Tippett, D. & Todd, M. (2017). Milford findings from a pre-kindergarten classroom: Making the case for STEM in early childhood education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9812-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  61. Toma, R. B. & Greca, I. M. (2018). The effect of integrative STEM instruction on elementary students’ attitudes toward science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education,14(4), 1383-1395. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83676 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  62. Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  63. Tuğluk, M. N. & Altın, G. (2018). Leadership and responsibility. In A. D. Öğretir-Özçelik & M. N. Tuğluk (Eds.), 21st Century Skills in Education and Industry. Ankara: Pegem Academy. [Google Scholar]
  64. Tuğluk, M. N. & Özkan, B. (2019). Analysis of MoNE 2013 preschool education program in terms of 21st century skills. Journal of Primary Education, 1(4), 29-38. [Google Scholar]
  65. Turan, S. & Demirel, Ö. (2009). The reliability and validity of the attitude scale towards problem-based learning. Education and Science, 34(152), 1-13. [Google Scholar]
  66. Uğraş, M. & Genç, Z. (2018). Investigating preschool teacher candidates’ STEM teaching intention and the views about STEM education. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 7(2), 724-744. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.408150 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  67. Uyanık-Balat, G. & Günşen, G. (2017). STEM approach in pre-school period. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 5(42), 337-348. [Google Scholar]
  68. Ünal, M. & Aksüt, P. (2019). STEM approach in early childhood. In P. Aksüt (Ed.), Science Education in Early Childhood (pp. 201-227). Ankara: Nobel Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  69. Valtonen, T., Sointu, E. T., Kukkonen, J., Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Ahonen, A., et al. (2017). Insights into Finnish first-year pre-service teachers’ perceptions of their 21st century skills. Education and Information Technologies, 22(5), 2055-2069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9529-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  70. Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C. & Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the twenty-first century. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 403-413. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  71. Wan Husin, W. N. F., Mohamad Arsad, N., Othman, O., Halım, L., Rasul, M. S., Osman, K. & Iksan, Z. (2016). Fostering students’ 21st century skills through project-oriented problem-based learning (POPBL) in integrated STEM education program. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(1), 60-77. [Google Scholar]
  72. Yaşar Ekici, F., Bardak, M. & Yousef Zadeh, M. (2018). STEM in early childhood. In K. A. Kırkıç & E. Aydın (Eds.), Hello STEM: An Innovative Teaching Approach (pp. 51-78). Konya: Education Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  73. Yeo, J. & Tan, S. C. (2014). Redesigning problem-based learning in the knowledge creation paradigm for school science learning. Instructional Science, 42(5), 747-775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9317-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]