International Journal of Progressive Education
Abbreviation: IJPE | ISSN (Print): 1554-5210 | DOI: 10.29329/ijpe

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2021, Vol. 17(2) 17-28

Developing a Mathematics Homework Evaluation Scale (MHES) for Secondary School Mathematics Teachers

Aziz İlhan, Ahmet Burak Süzen & Tayfun Tutak

pp. 17 - 28   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.332.2

Published online: April 07, 2021  |   Number of Views: 11  |  Number of Download: 42


Abstract

This study aims to develop a valid and reliable scale that shows the secondary school mathematics teachers’ evaluations of mathematics homework. A literature review was conducted, and a pool of 41 articles have been prepared for this purpose. Five expert academicians in the field of mathematics education were consulted for the content, construct, and appearance validity of the prepared items. According to the opinions of the field experts, the number of items was reduced from 41 to 38 and applied to 492 mathematics teachers in total. The answers of 20 mathematics teachers were removed from the scope of this study since the answers were either incomplete or coded incorrectly. Therefore, scale forms collected from 472 mathematics teachers were included in this study. This form data was split, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were done. The construct validity was analyzed via EFA. The scale is a five-factor scale of the five-point Likert scale, which explains the 64.643% of the total variance with 21 items according to EFA results. The reliability of the scale was tested with Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient, and the coefficient was calculated as 0.737. The subscales of the scale are titled “Parent Relationship”, “Motivation”, “Control and Evaluation”, “Time” and “Source Use” respectively. CFA was carried out for the scale, and it was concluded that the fit indices are either acceptable or perfect. As a result, a reliable and valid “Teacher Approaches for Mathematics Homework Scale” has been added to the literature.

Keywords: Mathematics Education, Homework, Scale Development, Mathematics Teachers


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Ilhan, A., Suzen, A.B. & Tutak, T. (2021). Developing a Mathematics Homework Evaluation Scale (MHES) for Secondary School Mathematics Teachers . International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(2), 17-28. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2020.332.2

Harvard
Ilhan, A., Suzen, A. and Tutak, T. (2021). Developing a Mathematics Homework Evaluation Scale (MHES) for Secondary School Mathematics Teachers . International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(2), pp. 17-28.

Chicago 16th edition
Ilhan, Aziz, Ahmet Burak Suzen and Tayfun Tutak (2021). "Developing a Mathematics Homework Evaluation Scale (MHES) for Secondary School Mathematics Teachers ". International Journal of Progressive Education 17 (2):17-28. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2020.332.2.

References
  1. Arıkan, S. (2017). The relationship between homework and mathematics achievement in Turkey according to TIMSS 2011. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 8(26), 256-276. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aladag, C., & Dogu, S. (2009). The evaluation of homeworks which are given at secondary school according to students views. Selcuk University Social Sciences Institute Journal, 21(1), 15-23. [Google Scholar]
  3. Aytuna, H. A. (1998). Teaching and teaching problems in middle schools. Ankara: MEB Publications.  [Google Scholar]
  4. Bal, A. P. (2012). A project evaluation scale development study related to mathematics course. Pegem Journal of Education and Training, 2(3), 11-19. [Google Scholar]
  5. Benli, E., & Sarıkaya, M. (2011). Arranging the views of primary school second grade students for homework given in science and technology lessons according to the grade levels and gender. Kastamonu Education Journal, 21(2), 489-502. [Google Scholar]
  6. Beydogan, H. Ö., & Sahin, Ç. (2000). The level of achieving the purpose of homework in primary schools. 9th National Educational Sciences Congress, September 27-30, 2000, Erzurum. [Google Scholar]
  7. Binbasıoglu, C. (1994a). Problems of teaching in schools. Ankara: Egit-Der Publications. [Google Scholar]
  8. Binbasıoglu, C. (1994b). Teaching-knowledge at school. Ankara: Binbasıoglu Publications. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (1999). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS release 8 for Windows. London and New York, Taylor & Francis e-Library, Routledge.  [Google Scholar]
  10. Buyukozturk, Ş. (2007). A handbook of data analysis for social sciences (7th ed.). Ankara: Pegem Academy Publications. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cooper, H. (1989). Homework: White plains. New York: Longman. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cooper, H., & Valentine, J. C. (2001). Using research to answer practical questions about homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(1), 143–153. [Google Scholar]
  14. De-Vellis, R. (2012). Scale development. Theory and applications (3th ed.). California: Thousand Oaks, SAGE Publicatıon. [Google Scholar]
  15. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  16. Flunger, B., Trautwein, U., Nagengast, B., Ludtke, O., Niggli, A., & Schnyder, I. (2017). A person-centered approach to homework behavior: Students’ characteristics predict their homework learning type. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 48(1), 1-15. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gedik, M., & Orhan S. (2013). Opinions of 6th and 7th-grade elementary school students about their homework for Turkish lessons. Journal of the Black Sea Studies, 38(1), 135-148. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gumuseli, A. İ. (2004). The relationship between primary school principals’ conflict management styles and teachers’ satisfaction. Akdeniz Journal of Education, 1(1), 1-18. [Google Scholar]
  19. Iflazoglu, A., & Hizmetci, S. (2006). A qualitative study example of primary school classroom teachers' opinions about homework. National Classroom Teacher Congress. Ankara, April 14-16, 2006, Volume 2, 427–433. [Google Scholar]
  20. Joreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kalaycı, S. (2010). Statistics techniques with SPSS applied multi variates. Ankara: Asil Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kaplan, G. (2018). Opinions of students, teachers and parents about mathematics homeworks assigned to middle school students. Dissertation Thesis, Hacettepe University, Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Ankara.  [Google Scholar]
  23. Karagoz, Y., & Kosterelioglu, İ. (2008). Developing evaluation scale of communication skills with factor analysis. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, 21(1), 81-98. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kumar, A. (2006). Homework education: A powerful tool of learning. Retrieved from: https:// books.google.com.tr/books?isbn=8126906472 at 01.01.2020. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(1), 563–575. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ministry of National Education [MoNE] (2018). Mathematic curriculum (Primary and secondary school 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. class). Retrieved from https://ttkb.meb.gov.tr at 12.01.2021. [Google Scholar]
  27. Morgan, C., & O’Reilly, M. G. (1999). Assessing open and distance learners. London: Kogan Page. [Google Scholar]
  28. Oguzkan, F. (1989). Education in secondary schools. Ankara: Emel Publications. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ozcan Z. Ç., & Erktin, E. (2014). Mathematics homework behavior scale: reliability and validity study. Boğaziçi University Journal of Education, 31(2), 27-47. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ozer, B., & Ocal S. (2013). The evaluation of the applications and opinions of classroom teachers for homeworks. International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education, 2(1), 133-149. [Google Scholar]
  31. Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS survival manual. Maidenhead: Open University Press. [Google Scholar]
  32. Reid, N. (2006). Thoughts on attitude measurement. Research in Science & Technological Education, 24(1), 3–27. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sarıgoz, O. (2011). Assessment of thoughts of secondary education students about homeworks given in chemistry lesson. Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges, 1(1), 80-87. [Google Scholar]
  34. Simsek, O. F. (2006). Scientific research and structural equation model. Retrieved from: www.science.ankara.edu.tr/~ozbek/omer.htm at 28.12.2019. [Google Scholar]
  35. Tatlıdil, H. (2002). Statistical analysis with applied multivariate. Ankara: Akademi Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  36. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson, Boston. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tavsancıl, E. (2002). Measuring behaviors and data analysis with SPSS. Ankara: Nobel Publications. [Google Scholar]
  38. Turkoglu, A., Karakus, M., & Iflazoglu, A. (2007). Homework in primary school. İstanbul: Morpa Publications. [Google Scholar]
  39. Trautwein, U., Koller, O., Schmitz, B., & Baumert, J. (2002). Do homework assignments enhance achievement? A multilevel analysis of 7th-grade mathematics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(1), 26-50. [Google Scholar]
  40. Warton, P. M. (1997). Learning about responsibility: Lessons from homework. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(2), 213–221. [Google Scholar]
  41. Warton, P. M. (2001). The forgotten voices in homework: Views of students. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 155-165. [Google Scholar]
  42. Yucel, A. S. (2004). The analysis of the attitudes of secondary education students towards chemistry assignments. Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 24(1), 147-159. [Google Scholar]