International Journal of Progressive Education
Abbreviation: IJPE | ISSN (Print): 1554-5210 | DOI: 10.29329/ijpe

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2021, Vol. 17(3) 202-215

The Reasons for and Results of Ostracism at Schools and Recommendations for Solutions through Teacher Experiences

Selda Polat Hüsrevşahi

pp. 202 - 215   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.346.13

Published online: June 07, 2021  |   Number of Views: 1  |  Number of Download: 19


Abstract

As in other organizations, there is ostracism also in educational organizations. Apart from the individual consequences of being ostracized, there are also undesirable organizational consequences. Considering the potential of educational organizations to transform individuals, the effect of ostracism on teachers becomes particularly important. The purpose of the study was to examine the reasons for and results of the ostracism that teachers face at schools by the school principals, and the recommendations for solutions to prevent ostracism. The study group of the study, which was structured with the phenomenology design, consisted of 12 elementary and middle primary school teachers who had personal experience with ostracism. The data collected through interviews were analyzed with content analysis. The study revealed that teachers were exposed to ostracism for political, social and/or individual reasons. Ostracized teachers experienced psychological and organizational problems. The teachers stated that preventing ostracism in schools would be possible with a more democratic and fairer organizational culture.

Keywords: Ostracism in the Workplace, School Administrator, Organizational Democracy, Organizational Culture, K-12 Teacher


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Husrevsahi, S.P. (2021). The Reasons for and Results of Ostracism at Schools and Recommendations for Solutions through Teacher Experiences . International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(3), 202-215. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2021.346.13

Harvard
Husrevsahi, S. (2021). The Reasons for and Results of Ostracism at Schools and Recommendations for Solutions through Teacher Experiences . International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(3), pp. 202-215.

Chicago 16th edition
Husrevsahi, Selda Polat (2021). "The Reasons for and Results of Ostracism at Schools and Recommendations for Solutions through Teacher Experiences ". International Journal of Progressive Education 17 (3):202-215. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2021.346.13.

References
  1. Abaslı, K. (2018). Örgütsel dışlanma, işe yabancılaşma ve örgütsel sinizm ilişkisine yönelik öğretmen görüşleri. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  2. Akcan, E., Polat, S. ve Ölçüm, D. (2017). Yönetici ve öğretmen görüşlerine göre sendikal faaliyetlerin okullara etkisi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(3), 1101-1119. [Google Scholar]
  3. Argon, T. (2016). Öğretmen görüşlerine göre ilkokullarda yöneticilerin kayırmacılık davranışları. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 24 (1), 233-250. [Google Scholar]
  4. Aydogan, İ. (2009). Favoritism in the Turkish educational system: Nepotism, cronyism and patronage. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 4 (1), 19-35. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ataç O. ve L., Köse, S. (2017). The relationship between organizational democracy and organizational dissent: a research on white collar workers. Istanbul University Journal of the School Business. 46 (1), 117-132 ISSN: 1303-1732 – http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/iuisletme [Google Scholar]
  6. Averıll, J. R. (1983). Studies on Anger and Aggression: Implications for theories of emotion, American Psychologist, 38(11): 1145. [Google Scholar]
  7. Baltacı, A. (2017). Nitel veri analizinde Miles-Huberman modeli. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(1), 1-15. https://dergipark.org.tr/aeusbed/issue/30008/290583  [Google Scholar]
  8. Baumeister, R. F., and Tice, D. M. (1990). Anxiety and social exclusion. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 165–195.  [Google Scholar]
  9. Beetham, D.and Boyle, K. (1998) Demokrasinin Temelleri 80 Soru ve Cevap (Çev. Vahit Bıçak) Ankara: Liberte Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bowles, S.and Gintis, H. (1993). A Political and Economic Case for the Democratic Enterprise. Economics and Philosophy, 9(1), 75-100. [Google Scholar]
  11. Creswell, J. W. (2016). [Research Design] Araştırma Deseni: Nitel, Nicel ve Karma Yöntem Yaklaşımları. (4. Baskıdan çeviri) Çev. Ed. S. B. Demir, Eğiten Kitap, 2. Baskı [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheney, G. (1995). Democracy in the Workplace: Theory and Practice from the Perspective of Communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23(3), 167-200. [Google Scholar]
  13. Crane,A.and Matten, D. (2005) What is Stakeholder Democracy? Perspectives and Issues, Business Ethics: A Europan Review, 14 (1), 6-13 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dönmez, H.ve Mete, A. Y. (2019). Tekirdağ’da Görev Yapan Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Dışlanma Düzeyi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.Trakya Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. [Google Scholar]
  15. Eickholt, M.S., and Goodboy, A.K. (2017). Investment model predictions of workplace ostracism on K–12 teachers’ commitment to their schools and the profession of teaching. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 32(2), 139-157. [Google Scholar]
  16. Erdemli, Ö., ve Kurum, G. (2019). Ostracism at school from school principals’ and teachers’ point of view: Causes and results. Hacettepe University Journal of Education. doi: 10.16986/HUJE.2019051589 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  17. Ferris, D.L., Brown, D.J., Berry, J.W., and Lian, H. (2008). The development and validation of the workplace ostracism scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1348-1366. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fiset J, Al Hajj R. and Vongas JG (2017) Workplace ostracism seen through the lens of power. Frontiers in Psychology 8 (1528). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01528 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  19. Gibson, D. E. and Callıster, R. R. (2010). Anger in organizations: Review and integration”, Journal of Management, 36 (1): 66-93. [Google Scholar]
  20. Halis, M. ve Demirel, Y. (2016). Sosyal desteğin örgütsel soyutlama (dışlanma) üzerine etkisi. Kastamonu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (11), 318-335. [Google Scholar]
  21. Harrison, J. S., Freeman, R. E. (2004). Is rganizational Democracy Worth the Effort? The Academy of Management Executive, 18(3), 49-53. [Google Scholar]
  22. Harvey, M., Moeller, M., Kiessling, T.and  Dabicet M.(2018) Ostracism in the workplace,: “Being voted off the island. Organizational  Dynamics 48 (4) 100675 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2018.08.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  23. Hitlan, R.T., Cliffton, R.J., & DeSoto, M.C. (2006). Perceived exclusion in the workplace: The moderating effects of gender on workrelated attitudes and psychological health. North American Journal of Psychology, 8(2), 217- 236 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J. and Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hofstede G. (1993), Cultural constraints in management theories, The Academy of Management Perspectives 7(1), 81-94.  [Google Scholar]
  26. Hofstede, G. (2001), Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Instutions, and Organizations across Nations, (2’nd. Ed.), Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  27. Holley, E. (2012). A Time For Cognitive Change: The Reappraisal of Anger, Interpersonal Injustice, and Counterproductive Work Behaviors, Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Washington, Washington. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kassing, J.  W.  (1998).  Development and validation of the organizational dissent scale.  Management Communication Quarterly, 12 (2), 183-229 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kaya, Ç., Ataman, G. ve Aydın, Y. B. (2017). Workplace ostracism and work engagement: The moderating role of neuroticism. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(2), 17-28 [Google Scholar]
  30. Keskinkılıç Kara, S. B. (2016). Individual and organizational effects of political orientation discrimination on teachers in schools, 24 (3), Kastamonu Education Journal, 1371-1384 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kızıltepe Z. (2017). Nitel Veri Analizi. Nitel Araştırma:Yöntem, Teknik, Analiz ve Yaklaşımları. Ed. F. N. Seggie; Y. Bayyurt, 253-267, Anı Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  32. Leary M. R. (2001). Interpersonel rejection. NewYork: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lee, K., and Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role  affect and cognitions”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1): 131-152. [Google Scholar]
  34. Leslie, L. M. and M. J. Gelfand (2012) The cultural psychology of social ınfluence: ımplications for organizational politics", In Ferris, G. R. ve D. C. Treadway (Ed), Politics in Organizations Theory and Research Considerations, USA: Taylor and Francis Group, LLC. Lewand [Google Scholar]
  35. Mccardle, J. G. (2007). Organizational justice and workplace deviance: The role of organizational structure, powerlessness, and information salience, Unpublished doctoral dissertation Central Florida Orlando Üniversitesi, Florida, ABD. [Google Scholar]
  36. Meıer, L. L., and Semmer, N. K. (2012). Lack of reciprocity and strain: Narcissism as a Moderator of the association between feeling under benefited and ırritation”, Work & Stress, 26(1):56-67. [Google Scholar]
  37. Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel araştırma: Desen ve uygulama için bir rehber (S. Turan, Çev.). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  38. Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  39. O’Reilly, J., Robinson, S. L., Berdahl, J. L., and Banki, S. (2015). Is negative attention better than no attention? The comparative effects of ostracism and harassment at work. Organ. Sci. 26, 774–793. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2014.0900 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  40. Özkanan, A. ve Erdem, R. (2015). Yönetimde kayırmacı uygulamalar üzerine nitel bir çalışma. MAKÜ İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2 (4), 7-28. [Google Scholar]
  41. Özaydın, M. M., & Han, E. (2014). Sendika üyesi kamu görevlilerinin sendika-siyaset ilişkisine yönelik yaklaşımları üzerine bir alan araştırması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(2), 57-73 [Google Scholar]
  42. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA [Google Scholar]
  43. Pausch, M. (2013). Workplace democracy: From a democratic ıdeal to a managerial tool and back. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 19(1), 1-19. [Google Scholar]
  44. Polat, S., and Hiçyılmaz, G. (2017). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin maruz kaldıkları ayrımcılık davranışları ve bu davranışların nedenleri. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(2), 47-66. DOI: 10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.5c2s3m [Google Scholar]
  45. Punch, K. F. (2014). Sosyal araştırmalara giriş: Nicel ve nitel yaklaşımlar. (3. Baskı). (D. Bayrak, H. B. Arslan ve Z. Akyüz, Çev.) Ankara: Siyasal. [Google Scholar]
  46. Robinson, S. L.O’Reilly, J., &Wang, W. (2013). Invisible at work an integrated model of workplace ostracism. Journal of Management 39 (1), 203-231 https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312466141 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  47. Russell, R. (1997). Workplace democracy and organizational communication. Communication Studies, 48(4), 279-284. [Google Scholar]
  48. Scott, K. D. (2007). The development and test of an exchange-based model of Interpersonal workplace exclusion. Doctoral Dissertations, Lexington: University of Kentucky [Google Scholar]
  49. Sloan, M. M. (2004). The Effects of Occupational Characteristics on The Experience and Expression of Anger in The Workplace, Work and Occupations, 31(1): 38-72. [Google Scholar]
  50. Sadykova, G., ve Tutar, H. (2014). Örgütsel demokrasi ve örgütsel muhalefet arasındaki ilişki üzerine bir inceleme. İşletme Bilimi Dergisi, 2(1), 1-16. [Google Scholar]
  51. Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., and Stucke, T. S. (2001). If you can’t join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1058–1069. [Google Scholar]
  52. Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., and Werner, J. M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: an exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academic Management. Review. 23, 513–530. doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  53. Williams, K. D. (2001). Ostracism: The power of silence. New York: Guilford Press [Google Scholar]
  54. Williams K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review Pyschology. 58, 425-452, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  55. Leary, M. R. (2001). Interpersonal Rejection. New York: Oxford University Press [Google Scholar]
  56. Williams, K.D., and Zadro, L. (2005). Ostracism: The indiscriminate early detection system. J. P. Forgas & W. Von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection and bullying (19-34). New York: Psychology Press. [Google Scholar]
  57. Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek H. (2011). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (6. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin  Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
  58. Yılmaz, Ö. (2018). İlkokul ve ortaokul öğretmenlerinin örgütsel dişlanma ve örgütsel uyum algilari arasindaki ilişki. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Bolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bolu. [Google Scholar]