International Journal of Progressive Education
Abbreviation: IJPE | ISSN (Print): 1554-5210 | DOI: 10.29329/ijpe

Original article | International Journal of Progressive Education 2019, Vol. 15(4) 96-107

Opinions of Social Studies Candidate Teachers on ''Democracy and Citizenship''

Selda Şan, Nurhak Cem Dedebali & İskender Daşdemir

pp. 96 - 107   |  DOI:

Published online: August 02, 2019  |   Number of Views: 127  |  Number of Download: 368


When considered the basis of social studies, it can be seen that citizenship and citizenship-related issues are of vital importance. After the industrial revolution and immigration, education was considered as a solution to keep people together healthily who have serious problems with each other and are from different cultures. Within the context of this solution, raising citizens capable of living in society was aimed and this duty was given to social studies education programs. During the time, different forms and perceptions of citizenship have emerged and expectations of countries/governments from their citizens have changed. In the course of globalization, perceptions and expectations of citizens also have been transformed. In past, raising citizens obeying the state was the aim, today the expectation is to raise citizens who can carry their states, nations and even the world to higher levels and who can criticize, explore, solve problems and develop themselves at a national and universal level. Since human beings have to live together with different cultures and nations, they are expected to respect different ones from themselves and to be loyal to democratic values with a sense of tolerance. Today, the concept of citizenship cannot be considered without democracy and values of democracy. It is also important to reveal what social studies candidate teachers understand from the combination of citizenship and democracy concepts, which have crucial place in the nature of social studies and its education. For this reason, the aim of this research is to reveal the opinions of social studies candidate teachers on democracy and citizenship. This research is carried out using a qualitative research method. Social studies candidate teachers educated at Ege University makes up the study group of this research. In the study, opinions of social studies candidate teachers were received using a questionnaire consisting of open-ended questions.       


The research is carried out with 165 participants in total based on a voluntary basis. However, blank and meaningless data is eliminated and thus data of 135 participants is used in total. Data is collected with an open-ended questionnaire and is analyzed using content analysis method. In the result of the research, social studies candidate teachers defined citizenship as duties and responsibilities and they defined democracy rights-liberties and duties-responsibilities when they defined the concepts of democracy and citizenship. It can be said that according to social studies candidate teachers, democracy gives the meaning of rights and liberties to citizenship concept. They expressed a relation between two concepts and mentioned basic values/characteristics of democracy such as equality, justice, tolerance, freedom. However, results of this study demonstrate the necessity of a license program or teacher education program that handles the citizenship with a multi-dimensional and constructivist approach.    

Keywords: Social Studies candidate teachers’ opinions, democracy, citizenship

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
San, S., Dedebali, N.C. & Dasdemir, I. (2019). Opinions of Social Studies Candidate Teachers on ''Democracy and Citizenship'' . International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(4), 96-107. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2019.203.8

San, S., Dedebali, N. and Dasdemir, I. (2019). Opinions of Social Studies Candidate Teachers on ''Democracy and Citizenship'' . International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(4), pp. 96-107.

Chicago 16th edition
San, Selda, Nurhak Cem Dedebali and Iskender Dasdemir (2019). "Opinions of Social Studies Candidate Teachers on ''Democracy and Citizenship'' ". International Journal of Progressive Education 15 (4):96-107. doi:10.29329/ijpe.2019.203.8.

  1. Abowitz, K. K. & Harnish, J. (2006). Contemporary discourses of citizenship. Review Of Educational Research, 76 (4), 653-690. [Google Scholar]
  2. Akın, U. & Özdemir, M. (2009). The examination of teacher candidates’ democratic values in terms of various variables: The case of faculty of educational sciences. Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 42 (2), 183-198. [Google Scholar]
  3. Aktaş, M. (2015). A critical look at the concept of democracy. Journal of Social Sciences of Mus Alparslan University, 3 (1), 87-105. [Google Scholar]
  4. Aktas, M. (2014). The Arab Uprisings and Democracy. Retrieved from on 20th July, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  5. Atasoy, T. & Koç, H. (2015). The role of geography teaching in active citizeship education: The opinion of faculty members. Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken/Journal of World of Turks, 7(2), 113-131. [Google Scholar]
  6. Barro, R. J. (1996). Democracy and growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 1-27. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bennett, W. L. (2008). Changing citizenship in the digital age. W. Lance Bennett (Ed.) Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth (pp. 1-24). London: Mit Press. [Google Scholar]
  8. Burdeau, G. (1964). Democracy-Synthetic Testing-.Bülent Nuri Esen (Trans.). Ankara: Ajans Türk Matbaası  [Google Scholar]
  9. Dalton, R. J. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56 (1), 76-98. [Google Scholar]
  10. Demircioğlu, İ. H., Mutluer, C. & Demircioğlu, E. (2011). The perceptions of the social studies student teachers about democratic teacher. Kastamonu Education Journal, 19 (2), 577-586. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gombert, T. & et al (2009). Social Democracy Handbook 1, Fundamentals of social Democracy. Recai Hallaç (Trans.). Istanbul: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gömleksiz, M. N., Kan, A. Ü. & Ümmühan, Ö. (2012). Metaphorical perceptions of social studies teacher candidates about democracy as a value. Journal of Values Education, 10 (24), 79-100. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hablemitoğlu, Ş. & Özmete, E. (2012). A suggestion for effective citizenship education. Journal of Ankara Health Sciences, 1(3), 39-54.   [Google Scholar]
  14. Holston, J. & Appadurai, A. (1999). Cities and citizenship. James Holston (Ed.). Cities and citizenship. (1-21). London: Duke University Press. [Google Scholar]
  15. İbrahimoğlu, Z. & Şan, S. (2018). Examination of curriculum of Azerbaijan in terms of citizenship training. Marmara Geographical Review, (37), 70-78. Doı: 10.14781/Mcd.386120 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kalaycı, N. & Hayırsever, F. (2014). An analysis of citizenship and democracy education text book in the context of gender equality and determining students’ perceptions on gender equality. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14 (3), 1065-1072. [Google Scholar]
  17. Keskin, S. C. & Yüceer, D. (2013). Citizenship education in Denmark. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 4 (1), 97-120. [Google Scholar]
  18. Koçak, A. & Arun, Ö. (2006). The sampling problem in content analysis studies. Journal of Selçuk Communication, 4 (3), 21-28. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kondu, Z. & Sakar, T. (2013). Why do we give education about citizenship and democracy? Mehmet Akif Ersoy Unıversity Journal of The Institue Educational Sciences, 2 (3), 49-60. [Google Scholar]
  20. Korkmaz, E. (2016). Deliberative democracy as one the concept of democracy and modern democracy theories (pp.365-369). Balcı, M. (Ed.). Genç Hukukçular Hukuk Okumaları Birikimler (Young Lawyers Read Law Accumulations)–V-, İstanbul: Hukuk Vakfı Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kuçuradi, İ. (1998). The concept and problems of democracy in the twenty-first century. Hacettepe University Journal of Faculty of Letters, 15, 21-27. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kuş, Z. & Aksu, A. (2017). Social studies teachers’ beliefs on citizenship and citizenship education. International Journal of Türkish Education Sciences, 5 (8), 18-41.  [Google Scholar]
  23. Memişoğlu, H. (2014). The education of citizenship in regard to the opinions of social sciences teachers. Electronic Turkish Studies, 9 (5). [Google Scholar]
  24. Mihailidis, P. & Thevenin, B. (2013). Media literacy as a core competency for engaged citizenship in participatory democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(11), 1611-1622. [Google Scholar]
  25. Moghadam, V. M. (2013). What is democracy? Promises and perils of the Arab Spring. Current Sociology, 61(4), 393–408.  [Google Scholar]
  26. Sağlam, H. İ. (2011). Proficiency levels of student teachers effective citizenship. Kastamonu Education Journal, 19 (1), 39-50. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sarı, M. & Sadık, F. (2011). Democracy perceptions of teacher candidates (Çukurova University Sample). International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 1 (2), 67-82. [Google Scholar]
  28. Schmitter, P. C. & Karl, T. L. (1991). What democracy is and is not. Journal of Democracy, 2(3), 75-88. [Google Scholar]
  29. Selçuk, Z., Palancı, M., Kandemir, M. & Dündar, H. (2014). Tendencies of the researches published in education and science Journal: Content analysis. Education and Science, 39 (173), 424-449.  [Google Scholar]
  30. Şimşek, U., Tıkman, F., Yıldırım, E. & Şentürk, M. (2017). The views of pre-service social studies teachers and pre-service classroom teachers about citizenship education: A qualitative study. Dicle University Journal of Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education, 32, 913-925. [Google Scholar]
  31. Toraman, Ç. & Gözütok, F. D. (2014). Evaluation of 8th grade “citizenship and democracy education” curriculum. Elementary Education, 13 (3), 954-979. [Google Scholar]
  32. Torney-Purta, J. (2002). What adolescents know about citizenship and democracy. Educational Leadership, 59 (4), 45-50. [Google Scholar]
  33. Tunç, H. (2008). Types of democracy and the concept of negotiating democracy. Gazi University Faculty of Law Review, 12 (1-2), 1113-1132. [Google Scholar]
  34. Türk Dil Kurumu (2018). Democracy. Retrieved from in 27.09.2018. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ulutaş, E. (2014). Constitutional Process and Citizenship in Turkey. Journal of Academic Inquiries, 9 (1), 73-103. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ural, Ş. (1999). The concept of demovravy, social values and individual. Journal of The Faculty of Divinity of Ankara University, 40. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ünal, F. & Yıldız, A. (2012). Comparison of draft program of citizenship education in the Canton of Zürih, Switzerland with the program of democracy and citizenship education course in Turkey. IBB International Refereed Academic Social Sciences Journal, 3 (5), 352-372. [Google Scholar]
  38. Yağcı, E. (1998). Democracy ve education. Education and Science, 22 (107), 15-22. [Google Scholar]
  39. Yazıcı, K. (2011). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının demokratik değerlerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Education and Science, 36 (159), 165-178.  [Google Scholar]
  40. Yıldırım, A. (1999). Basic features of qualitative research methods and their importance in educational research. Education and Science, 23 (112), 7-17. [Google Scholar]